Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
Ling-3.0-tiny scores 55 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Agent interface, 60 against 35
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 50
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.0-tiny | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 31 | 28 | Ling-3.0-tiny +3 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 75 | Ling-3.0-tiny +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 35 | Ling-3.0-tiny +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 52 | Ling-3.0-tiny +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.0-tiny | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.0-tiny or Olmo 3 7B Think?
Ling-3.0-tiny scores 55 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.0-tiny or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-0-tiny olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-0-tiny", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key