Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Audio-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
LFM3-Audio-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice agents on a laptop or phone that need speech in, speech out and tool calls from one small model
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 75
- Agent interface, 85 against 35
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release, though the card lists vLLM and SGLang
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 40
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface LFM3-Audio-2B +50
LFM3-Audio-2B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (9,328 characters), with roles, audio, tools, deferred tools and tool results. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card names turning spoken requests into tool calls as one of its four uses. Structured output 5, the card says the model is designed for structured outputs without saying how to ask for JSON. Liquid's API guide documents response_format with lfm3-1.7b as its example. Reasoning control 10, the card documents reasoning per request for text replies: the caller prefills the assistant turn with an open think tag to let the model reason, or a closed one for a direct answer, with a use_thinking example. Context 5, 32K tokens of input and output per the card. 20 + 25 + 20 + 5 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Olmo 3 7B Think 35
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, since only the template and vLLM's own parser describe it. Trained tool calling earns nothing, because Ai2's report says tool calling was trained into the Instruct model, not Think. Structured output earns nothing. Reasoning control earns nothing, since it always thinks. Context earns 5 for 65,536 tokens trained. 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 35.
Risk Olmo 3 7B Think +35
LFM3-Audio-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Olmo 3 7B Think 75
File safety earns 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs. Provenance earns 15, files in the allenai organisation Ai2 links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation earns 20, as Ai2 publishes its safety results and the OLMES harness to rerun them. Agent guidance earns 5 for the card's general cautions. Licence risk earns 5, losing 5 for disallowed uses beyond the law and 5 because Ai2 can update the guidelines and end access at its discretion. The security programme earns 5 for a reporting route, a security.txt now past its expiry and a channel for security concerns in the guidelines, with no public advisories. 25 + 15 + 20 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 75.
Reach LFM3-Audio-2B +5
LFM3-Audio-2B 80
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.17 GB projector file, and 1.27 GB × 1.2 = 1.5 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 10, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture with the LFM3 audio projector and speech output (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242, with a realtime client example that starts this model), and Ollama's library has an lfm3-audio entry. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-audio-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 80.
Olmo 3 7B Think 75
Memory earns the full 30, since Ollama's 4-bit build is 4.5 GB and fits 8 GB (per the 21 October check of Ollama's library). Runtimes earn 25, with released llama.cpp (b11963), Ollama (v0.40.14, pinning b11963), vLLM, LM Studio and Transformers all running it. Builds earn nothing, because Ai2 publishes no quantised build of its own. Terms earn 10, since the card binds Apache 2.0 to Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, a use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate. Hosted earns nothing, as the Hub's provider mapping is empty and Ai2 has no API for it. 30 + 25 + 0 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Audio-2B | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 75 | LFM3-Audio-2B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 35 | LFM3-Audio-2B +50 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 52 | 52 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Audio-2B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2024-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM3-Audio-2B
A 2B model that listens and speaks on an 8 GB machine, transcribes and translates 19 languages and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, voice chat is English only, Liquid hasn't answered the repository's questions, and there are no safety results or data sources.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning model for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
LFM3-Audio-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Audio-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-audio - llama.cpp ships examples/realtime_client.py for live speech with this model
- Prefill the assistant turn with an open think tag to let it reason before a text reply
- The context is 32K
- Voice chat is English only, while transcription, synthesis and translation cover 19 languages and locales
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Audio-2B or Olmo 3 7B Think?
LFM3-Audio-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Audio-2B or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Arete-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Mistral Large 4 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-audio-2b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-audio-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-audio-2b olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-audio-2b", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key