Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
LFM3-Audio-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice agents on a laptop or phone that need speech in, speech out and tool calls from one small model
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 52 against 36
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release, though the card lists vLLM and SGLang
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Risk, 50 against 40
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep LFM3-Audio-2B +16
LFM3-Audio-2B 52
Model card 17, Intended use (local agents, tool calling, structured outputs, fine-tuning), limitations (not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning, voice chat in English only), an architecture section, parameters (2B), context (32K) and 19 speech languages and locales. Training data 5, the card has no training section. Last change 20, the last commit, on 3 November 2026, changed the card's navigation icons, seven days before this check, and the one before it, on 31 October, edited the card. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 and 31 October 2026) has a reply from a LiquidAI member. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 5, the card gives a 32K context while config.json gives the language model 128,000 positions and Liquid's API lists 128,000 for the hosted model, so the card and the files don't agree on context. 17 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 52.
Ornith-1.5-397B 36
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 20, Ornith uploaded new shards to the NVFP4 build on 20 October 2026. Responsiveness 0, nobody from Ornith answered either of the 2 questions, or any of the six on its GGUF and NVFP4 builds. Version policy 0, every GGUF file and the NVFP4 shards were replaced in place in August with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE, the two chat templates differ, and the NVFP4 build carries shards its index doesn't use.
Reach LFM3-Audio-2B +15
LFM3-Audio-2B 80
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.17 GB projector file, and 1.27 GB × 1.2 = 1.5 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 10, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture with the LFM3 audio projector and speech output (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242, with a realtime client example that starts this model), and Ollama's library has an lfm3-audio entry. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-audio-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 80.
Ornith-1.5-397B 65
Memory 0, since the smallest 4-bit build, Ollama's at 242 GB, needs about 290 GB with the fifth added, above the 256 GB band, and Ornith's own Q4_K_M GGUF and NVFP4 builds need about the same. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.19.1, SGLang 0.5.9, Transformers 5.8.1, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture and Ollama's library, while LM Studio's entry is the base's. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4 and GGUF at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata on 21 October 2026, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it.
Risk Ornith-1.5-397B +10
LFM3-Audio-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Ornith-1.5-397B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Audio-2B | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 65 | LFM3-Audio-2B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 50 | Ornith-1.5-397B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 52 | 36 | LFM3-Audio-2B +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Audio-2B | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM3-Audio-2B
A 2B model that listens and speaks on an 8 GB machine, transcribes and translates 19 languages and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, voice chat is English only, Liquid hasn't answered the repository's questions, and there are no safety results or data sources.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's largest coding and terminal-agent model, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risks are a missing licence file, no safety results, no publisher replies and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
LFM3-Audio-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Audio-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-audio - llama.cpp ships examples/realtime_client.py for live speech with this model
- Prefill the assistant turn with an open think tag to let it reason before a text reply
- The context is 32K
- Voice chat is English only, while transcription, synthesis and translation cover 19 languages and locales
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Audio-2B or Ornith-1.5-397B?
LFM3-Audio-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-397B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Audio-2B or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kronos vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-audio-2b-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-audio-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-audio-2b ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-audio-2b", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key