Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
Gemma 4 E2B IT scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 65
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Needs about 290 GB of memory at 4 bits and about 970 GB in BF16, so it doesn't fit the reference machine
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Ornith-1.5-397B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 65 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 36 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +39 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.4/100 | C 59/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Ornith-1.5-397B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E2B IT
A small cousin for light agent work, tool-calling loops, transcription and image reading on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 5 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, with no published safety results.
Ornith-1.5-397B
Ornith's flagship coding and terminal-agent cousin, with XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It needs about 290 GB even at 4 bits, so a multi-GPU server, not the 128 GB reference machine. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results and files replaced without a note.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E2B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E2B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E2B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E2B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e2band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
Ornith-1.5-397B
- Start it with the card's vLLM command at
--tensor-parallel-size 8, orollama run ornith-1.5:397bon a machine with about 300 GB of memory - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- When downloading the NVFP4 build, fetch only the files its model.safetensors.index.json names (the 25-shard set, 241.7 GB), not the eight extra shards
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E2B IT or Ornith-1.5-397B?
Gemma 4 E2B IT scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-397B's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E2B IT or Ornith-1.5-397B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e2b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e2b-it ornith-1-5-397b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e2b-it", "b": "ornith-1-5-397b"}at/mcp, no key