Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
Laguna XS 2.1 and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.4 (C). Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 85
- Risk, 70 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 46
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation figures published
Best for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any discussion, including reports about the tokenizer and remote code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Laguna XS 2.1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 85 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 55 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 75 | 46 | Gemma 4 E2B IT +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.4/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gemma 4 E2B IT | Laguna XS 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Poolside |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-08-19 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Gemma 4 E2B IT
A small cousin for light agent work, tool-calling loops, transcription and image reading on a phone or laptop, under Apache 2.0. Google's 4-bit build needs about 5 GB with working space and runs in all the common runtimes. Google's card puts it far below larger Gemma 4 sizes on agent and coding tasks, with no published safety results.
Laguna XS 2.1
A small coding and agent cousin with 3B active parameters, so it's quick on modest hardware. Poolside's 4-bit GGUF, also Ollama's default, needs about 24 GB, and every major runtime runs it. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its discussions, there are no safety results, and the SGLang route runs repository code.
Before you call either
Gemma 4 E2B IT
- On the reference machine run
llama-server -hf google/gemma-4-E2B-it-qat-q4_0-gguf --hf-file gemma-4-E2B_q4_0-it.gguf --jinja -c 131072, and add--mmprojwith gemma-4-E2B-it-mmproj.gguf for images and audio - With Ollama run
ollama run gemma4:e2band raise num_ctx or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH, since the default context is small and agents want at least 64K - In vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser gemma4 --reasoning-parser gemma4(vLLM also--enable-auto-tool-choice), or tool calls come back as text; Google's w4a16 build is the 4-bit route there - Thinking is off by default; pass enable_thinking=True or start the system prompt with <|think|>, and drop earlier turns' thinking from history except on tool-call turns
- Put images before the text and audio after it, keep audio to 30 seconds and video to 60 frames, and validate tool names and arguments before running them
Laguna XS 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1, 20 GB of files, the same Q4_K_M as Poolside's GGUF - On our reference machine use
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 131072, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it), or BF16 with vLLM (66.9 GB) - With vLLM use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on a build with vllm-project/vllm#47311, or--tool-call-parser glm47on older builds - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The card warns that Ollama on Apple Silicon may return empty output until llama.cpp#25389 ships
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gemma 4 E2B IT or Laguna XS 2.1?
Laguna XS 2.1 and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.4 (C). Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Gemma 4 E2B IT or Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-120b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kolibri-1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs occamy-1.0
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-laguna-xs-2-1.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gemma-4-e2b-it.json·/api/v1/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gemma-4-e2b-it laguna-xs-2-1(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gemma-4-e2b-it", "b": "laguna-xs-2-1"}at/mcp, no key