Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
Laguna XS 2.1 and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any discussion, including reports about the tokenizer and remote code
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 46
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna XS 2.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 55 | Laguna XS 2.1 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 56 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna XS 2.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Laguna XS 2.1
A small coding and agent cousin with 3B active parameters, so it's quick on modest hardware. Poolside's 4-bit GGUF, also Ollama's default, needs about 24 GB, and every major runtime runs it. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its discussions, there are no safety results, and the SGLang route runs repository code.
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Before you call either
Laguna XS 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1, 20 GB of files, the same Q4_K_M as Poolside's GGUF - On our reference machine use
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 131072, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it), or BF16 with vLLM (66.9 GB) - With vLLM use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on a build with vllm-project/vllm#47311, or--tool-call-parser glm47on older builds - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The card warns that Ollama on Apple Silicon may return empty output until llama.cpp#25389 ships
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna XS 2.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
Laguna XS 2.1 and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna XS 2.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-xs-2-1-vs-nanbeige-4-3-33b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-xs-2-1 nanbeige-4-3-33b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-xs-2-1", "b": "nanbeige-4-3-33b"}at/mcp, no key