Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
Nanbeige4.3-33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-2B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 37
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Best for Builders who want a cheap local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks and image reading on a laptop, small GPU or CPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 55
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba, and only one inference provider
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Qwen3.5-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 80 | Qwen3.5-2B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 37 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 50.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Qwen3.5-2B
A small vision-language cousin for prototypes, fine-tuning and light local steps such as tool calls, tagging or reading an image, running in about 2 GB at 4 bits in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The main risk is neglect, with no safety results or answers from Alibaba since March.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Qwen3.5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:2b-q4_K_M(1.9 GB); plainqwen3.5:2bpulls the 2.7 GB Q8_0 build - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.3-33B or Qwen3.5-2B?
Nanbeige4.3-33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-2B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.3-33B or Qwen3.5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-3-33b-vs-qwen3-5-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-3-33b qwen3-5-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-3-33b", "b": "qwen3-5-2b"}at/mcp, no key