Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
Nanbeige4.3-33B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 31
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 55
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Ornith-1.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 95 | Ornith-1.5-9B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 50 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 31 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Ornith-1.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Ornith-1.5-9B
A small coding and terminal-agent cousin with thinking on by default, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse, and 262,144 tokens of context. Ornith's own 4-bit builds run in under 8 GB in most local runtimes. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results, files replaced without a note and no replies.
Before you call either
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Ornith-1.5-9B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:9b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUFwith the Q4_K_M file - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 with presence_penalty 1.5 for general tasks, per the card
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-9B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nanbeige4.3-33B or Ornith-1.5-9B?
Nanbeige4.3-33B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Nanbeige4.3-33B or Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nanbeige-4-3-33b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nanbeige-4-3-33b ornith-1-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nanbeige-4-3-33b", "b": "ornith-1-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key