Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Ornith-1.5-9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 60
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.3 against 1.8 out of 5
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next D
Best for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 40 against 31
Watch for
Two licences to satisfy, UkisAI's US$1M revenue limit and Qwen's separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-9B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 60 | Ornith-1.5-9B +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | Ornith-1.5-9B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Ornith-1.5-9B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 31 | 40 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-9B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-9B
A small coding and terminal-agent cousin with thinking on by default, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse, and 262,144 tokens of context. Ornith's own 4-bit builds run in under 8 GB in most local runtimes. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results, files replaced without a note and no replies.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large mixture-of-experts cousin, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and long agent sessions on a multi-GPU server. Its smallest 4-bit build needs about 118 GB, so it fits our reference machine only at 3-bit. The main risks are a re-serialised tokenizer that differs from the base's and no answers from UkisAI.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-9B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:9b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUFwith the Q4_K_M file - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 with presence_penalty 1.5 for general tasks, per the card
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-9B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a multi-GPU node use
vllm serve ukisai/Swift1.5-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parser the base's recipes and the card's SGLang command use - The card's vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code and the old repository name, neither is needed
- On our reference machine only UkisAI's GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF (84.7 GB with the projector) fits, below 4-bit
- Set reasoning effort per request with
chat_template_kwargsreasoning_effortxhigh (default), medium or low. UkisAI's own runs lose about 2.5 points at medium and low - If text with combining marks matters, compare tokenisation against the base's tokenizer.json before trusting outputs
- Check both licences before commercial use, UkisAI's stops at US$1M gross annual revenue and Qwen's needs a separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-9B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Ornith-1.5-9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 52.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-9B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-9b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-9b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-9b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key