Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
LFM3-VL-2B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop, phone or robot that need to read screens, documents, images and video from a model under 2 GB at 4 bits
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 77 against 31
Watch for
vLLM and SGLang support is unreleased, which the card says itself
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 85
- Risk, 50 against 40
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep LFM3-VL-2B +46
LFM3-VL-2B 77
Model card 17, Intended use (questions about video, documents, charts and app screens, finding objects, spatial reasoning), a limitation (not recommended for coding, multi-turn conversations or complex reasoning), architecture (language model, 14-layer vision encoder and projector), parameters (1.92B), context (128K) and 16 languages. Training data 5, A general description: the base's 22T tokens of pre-training with the kinds of data added since LFM2, then vision mid-training on image and video data, supervised fine-tuning, vision reinforcement learning and distillation. Last change 20, the last commit, on 9 November 2026, added the OpenVINO checkpoint to the card's inference table, a day before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 5 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 to 31 October 2026), 3 have a reply from a LiquidAI member, which is most. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the lfm3_vl architecture, the 128,000-token context and the vision settings in processor_config.json. 17 + 5 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 77.
Ornith-1.5-9B 31
Model card 11, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a description of the method with no data or cut-off. Last change 15, the newest change to the model's files was Ornith's NVFP4 build on 26 August 2026, 69 days ago, and no card of the model or its builds has changed since. Responsiveness 0, Ornith answered none of the 15 questions and reports. Version policy 0, the fourth safetensors shard and every GGUF file were replaced in place on 23 and 24 August with no note. File health 0, the card links a missing LICENSE and an unpublished Mobile build, and the two chat templates differ. 11 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 31.
Reach Ornith-1.5-9B +10
LFM3-VL-2B 85
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.20 GB projector file, and 1.30 GB × 1.2 = 1.6 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 15, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture and the LFM3-VL projector (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242), Ollama's library has an lfm3-vl entry, and LM Studio's catalogue lists liquid/lfm3-vl-2b. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-vl-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Ornith-1.5-9B 95
Memory 30, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 5.0 GB and needs about 6.0 GB with the fifth added, and its Q4_K_M GGUF and Ollama's build fit 16 GB too. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.19.1 (still in v0.33.0), SGLang 0.5.9, Transformers 5.8.1, llama.cpp's qwen35 architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35 architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes GGUF, MLX and NVFP4 at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata on 21 October 2026, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and only one inference provider (featherless-ai) serves it. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.
Risk Ornith-1.5-9B +10
LFM3-VL-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Ornith-1.5-9B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Agent interface LFM3-VL-2B +5
LFM3-VL-2B 90
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,129 characters), with roles, images and video, tools, deferred tools, tool results and the thinking switch. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card says its fine-tuning mix included tool calling and agentic traces. Structured output 5, the card's vLLM and SGLang commands set a structured-output backend and its fine-tuning table has a JSON extraction notebook, but nothing says how to ask this model for JSON. Liquid's API guide documents response_format with lfm3-1.7b as its example. Reasoning control 10, Liquid's chat-template page documents enable_thinking=False in apply_chat_template for LFM3, with reasoning on by default inside think tags, and the card documents preserve_thinking and reports a no-thinking configuration in its benchmarks. Context 10, 128K tokens of input and output per the card, and max_position_embeddings 128000 for the language model in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 90.
Ornith-1.5-9B 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card shows how tools go in and how calls come back and names the parser for vLLM and SGLang. Trained tool calling 20, Ornith trains it on agent tasks and the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented or claimed. Reasoning control 10, Ornith's template turns thinking off per request with enable_thinking set to false and the card says the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content, though the card doesn't name the switch. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-VL-2B | Ornith-1.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 95 | Ornith-1.5-9B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 50 | Ornith-1.5-9B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 85 | LFM3-VL-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 77 | 31 | LFM3-VL-2B +46 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-VL-2B | Ornith-1.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM3-VL-2B
A 1.92B vision model that reads images and video on an 8 GB machine, with a documented tool-call format and thinking. It runs today in llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio, while vLLM and SGLang support is still unreleased. Transformers needs repository code, and there are no safety results, security contact or data sources.
Ornith-1.5-9B
A small coding and terminal-agent cousin with thinking on by default, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse, and 262,144 tokens of context. Ornith's own 4-bit builds run in under 8 GB in most local runtimes. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results, files replaced without a note and no replies.
Before you call either
LFM3-VL-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-VL-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-vl, with llama.cpp b11960 or later - Use temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition penalty 1.1, per the card
- Video is sampled at 2 frames a second up to 768 frames, and each frame costs context. Video input in llama.cpp needs ffmpeg
- Don't plan on vLLM or SGLang until a release carries LFM3-VL
- Validate JSON output yourself
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for coding, multi-turn conversations or complex reasoning
Ornith-1.5-9B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:9b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUFwith the Q4_K_M file - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 with presence_penalty 1.5 for general tasks, per the card
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-9B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-VL-2B or Ornith-1.5-9B?
LFM3-VL-2B and Ornith-1.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-VL-2B or Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-VL-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kronos vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-vl-2b-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-vl-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-vl-2b ornith-1-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-vl-2b", "b": "ornith-1-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key