Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-9B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking.
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 31
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 205 GB
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 55
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling-Small | Ornith-1.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 95 | Ornith-1.5-9B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | Inkling-Small +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 31 | Inkling-Small +51 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling-Small | Ornith-1.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling-Small
A mixture-of-experts generalist with images and audio in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. It needs about 205 GB for Thinking Machines' NVFP4 build on recent NVIDIA or AMD datacentre GPUs, and Tinker or DeepInfra host it. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
Ornith-1.5-9B
A small coding and terminal-agent cousin with thinking on by default, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse, and 262,144 tokens of context. Ornith's own 4-bit builds run in under 8 GB in most local runtimes. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results, files replaced without a note and no replies.
Before you call either
Inkling-Small
- Start the NVFP4 build with SGLang's recipe,
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small-NVFP4 --tp 8 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling, on Blackwell for W4A4 - Use the inkling tool and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, or Thinking Machines' tml-renderers package to render prompts and parse calls yourself
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs and SGLang's cookbook list xhigh - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side and audio 16 kHz WAV under two minutes, per the card
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
Ornith-1.5-9B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:9b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUFwith the Q4_K_M file - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 with presence_penalty 1.5 for general tasks, per the card
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-9B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling-Small or Ornith-1.5-9B?
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-9B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling-Small or Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling-Small
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-small-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-small.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-small ornith-1-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-small", "b": "ornith-1-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key