Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling-Small vs LFM3-1.7B
Inkling-Small scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against LFM3-1.7B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LFM3-1.7B leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking.
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 40
- Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 67
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 205 GB
Best for Agents on a laptop, phone or small server that need tool calling and a long context from a model under 2 GB at 4 bits
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 55
- Agent interface, 100 against 85
Watch for
vLLM and SGLang have no released support, though the card lists both
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach LFM3-1.7B +30
Inkling-Small 55
Memory 5 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Thinking Machines' NVFP4 at 170.8 GB, about 205 GB with a fifth added, so it needs 256 GB. Runtimes 15, released Transformers, vLLM and SGLang run it, llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio don't. Builds 10, one quantised build (NVFP4). Terms 10, Apache 2.0 with a binding acceptable use policy on top, read as a custom licence. Download 10, no gate. Hosted 5, Thinking Machines' own Tinker serves it as beta serverless inference, and DeepInfra is live on Hugging Face.
LFM3-1.7B 85
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB, and 1.10 GB × 1.2 = 1.3 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 15, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture (src/models/lfm3.cpp at b12242), Ollama's library has an lfm3 entry, and LM Studio's catalogue runs the architecture (its liquid/lfm3-vl-2b entry; lmstudio-community publishes a GGUF of this model). Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-1.7b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Risk Inkling-Small +30
Inkling-Small 70
File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code to run. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation Thinking Machines links to, with a SHA-256 on every LFS file. Safety evaluation 10, Thinking Machines' own StrongREJECT and FORTRESS results and described external red-teaming, but nothing an outside party published or a harness to rerun. Agent guidance 10, the card says what its refusals miss and which safeguards to add, with nothing on prompt injection. Licence risk 5, 10 off for a use policy that reaches beyond the law and that can change at any time. Security programme 5, a security.txt and a disclosure policy, with public advisories unchecked and scored as absent.
LFM3-1.7B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Documentation and upkeep Inkling-Small +20
Inkling-Small 87
Model card 17 of 20, everything but a dated knowledge cut-off, counting Thinking Machines' own model card page. Training data 15, an EU training-content summary with sources, mix, a July 2026 collection cut-off and filtering. Last change 20, the files last changed on 31 July 2026, but Thinking Machines' Inkling renderer in tinker-cookbook changed in its 30 October 2026 release. Responsiveness 20, Thinking Machines answered 8 of the 9 questions in its discussions. Version policy 5, a first release. File health 10, the files agree and no broken-file report waits. 17+15+20+20+5+10 = 87.
LFM3-1.7B 67
Model card 17, Intended use (local agents, tool calling, structured outputs, fine-tuning), a limitation (not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning), architecture (24 layers: 13 gated short convolutions, 5 sliding-window and 6 global attention), parameters (1.73B), context (256K) and 16 languages. Training data 5, A general description: 22T tokens of pre-training in two stages with the kinds of data added since LFM2, 1.75T tokens of supervised fine-tuning, then mixed reinforcement learning, distillation from six specialist teachers and agentic reinforcement learning. Last change 20, the last commit, on 9 November 2026, added the OpenVINO checkpoint to the card's inference table, a day before this check. Responsiveness 10, Of the 22 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 October to 8 November 2026), 7 have a reply from a LiquidAI member, which is some. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the lfm3 architecture, the 262,144-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 5 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 10 = 67.
Agent interface LFM3-1.7B +15
Inkling-Small 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Thinking Machines' tml-renderers guide shows how tools are declared and how calls come back, and its package ships the parser. Trained tool calling 20, several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking effort is set per request from none to the maximum, and the reasoning comes back in reasoning_content. Context 10, up to 1M tokens.
LFM3-1.7B 100
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,129 characters), with roles, tools, deferred tools, tool results and the thinking switch. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card says the model was trained on tool calls and agentic traces and with reinforcement learning inside agent harnesses. Structured output 15, Liquid's API guide documents response_format with a JSON Schema, with lfm3-1.7b as the model in its examples, and says the schema is checked before generation starts. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking=False in the chat template to turn reasoning off per request, with reasoning on by default inside think tags, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, which says the mid-training stage extended the context window to 256K, and max_position_embeddings 262144 in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 10 = 100.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling-Small | LFM3-1.7B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 85 | LFM3-1.7B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 40 | Inkling-Small +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 100 | LFM3-1.7B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 87 | 67 | Inkling-Small +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 67/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling-Small | LFM3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-11-09 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-1.7B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Inkling-Small
A mixture-of-experts generalist with images and audio in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. It needs about 205 GB for Thinking Machines' NVFP4 build on recent NVIDIA or AMD datacentre GPUs, and Tinker or DeepInfra host it. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
LFM3-1.7B
A 1.73B model that fits an 8 GB machine with room to spare, with a documented tool-call format, deferred tools, a thinking switch and a 256K context. It runs today in llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio only, loads in Transformers through repository code, and has no safety results, security contact or data sources.
Before you call either
Inkling-Small
- Start the NVFP4 build with SGLang's recipe,
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small-NVFP4 --tp 8 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling, on Blackwell for W4A4 - Use the inkling tool and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, or Thinking Machines' tml-renderers package to render prompts and parse calls yourself
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs and SGLang's cookbook list xhigh - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side and audio 16 kHz WAV under two minutes, per the card
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
LFM3-1.7B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3 - Use temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition penalty 1.1 for chat, tools and agents, per the card
- Pass
enable_thinking=Falsefor direct answers, and expect it to reason anyway on hard tasks - For a large tool catalogue mark tools
defer_loadingand give it a search tool - Don't plan on vLLM or SGLang until a release carries LFM3
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling-Small or LFM3-1.7B?
Inkling-Small scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against LFM3-1.7B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LFM3-1.7B leads on reach and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Inkling-Small or LFM3-1.7B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-1.7B
- Arete-27B vs Inkling-Small
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-1.7B
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling-Small
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Carbon-X vs Inkling-Small
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-1.7B
- Cola2 vs Inkling-Small
- Cola2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Inkling-Small
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling-Small
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Inkling-Small
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Kronos
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Mistral Large 4
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs Recursive Flint
- Inkling-Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling-Small vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Inkling-Small vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs LFM3-1.7B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kronos vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-1.7B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-1.7B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-1.7B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-1.7B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-1.7B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-small-vs-lfm3-1-7b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-small.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm3-1-7b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-small lfm3-1-7b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-small", "b": "lfm3-1-7b"}at/mcp, no key