Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking.
Ahead on
- Risk, 70 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 53
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 205 GB
Best for Small teams and individuals running Qwen3.8-27B for agent or reasoning work who want shorter thinking traces on one 24 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 55
Watch for
PolyForm Small Business licence, free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling-Small | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 75 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 45 | Inkling-Small +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Inkling-Small +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 53 | Inkling-Small +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling-Small | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | BottleCap AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | PolyForm-Small-Business-1.0.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling-Small
A mixture-of-experts generalist with images and audio in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. It needs about 205 GB for Thinking Machines' NVFP4 build on recent NVIDIA or AMD datacentre GPUs, and Tinker or DeepInfra host it. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
A Qwen3.8-27B with shorter reasoning, for agent work where thinking tokens cost time, and BottleCap's 4-bit GGUF runs in about 19 GB. The main limits are the licence, which needs a paid licence above 100 people or 1,000,000 USD revenue, a gated main repository, and no safety results or training-data description.
Before you call either
Inkling-Small
- Start the NVFP4 build with SGLang's recipe,
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small-NVFP4 --tp 8 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling, on Blackwell for W4A4 - Use the inkling tool and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, or Thinking Machines' tml-renderers package to render prompts and parse calls yourself
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs and SGLang's cookbook list xhigh - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side and audio 16 kHz WAV under two minutes, per the card
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Check the licence first, an organisation with 100 or more people or 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue needs a commercial licence from BottleCap
- For files without the gate use
llama-server -hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17.4 GB - On vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml, and on SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Set
reasoning_effort(xhigh, medium or low) in chat_template_kwargs, any other value makes the template raise an error - Keep the base's sampling (temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the GGUF card says greedy decoding can loop
- The GGUFs carry an MTP head, and llama.cpp builds without MTP support for this architecture may refuse to load them with a missing blk.64 tensor
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling-Small or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)?
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling-Small or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling-Small
- BigBang-v1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-small-vs-thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-small.json·/api/v1/tools/thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-small thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-small", "b": "thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key