Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Kimi K3 B
Best for Teams with a multi-node GPU cluster who want an open 1M-context agent model for long coding and research work
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 45
Watch for
1,561 GB of files at its smallest publisher build, far beyond any single machine
Best for Small teams and individuals running Qwen3.8-27B for agent or reasoning work who want shorter thinking traces on one 24 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 50
- Agent interface, 70 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 53 against 41
Watch for
PolyForm Small Business licence, free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi K3 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 75 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 45 | Kimi K3 +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 70 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 53 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.4/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi K3 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | BottleCap AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Kimi K3 License (modified MIT) | PolyForm-Small-Business-1.0.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is a 2.8T multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, parallel tool calls and per-request effort, for long coding and research sessions. Its 1,561 GB of files need a multi-node GPU cluster, so most agents will call a hosted copy. The main risks are Moonshot's Python running at load and prompt time, and no answers in its repository.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
A Qwen3.8-27B with shorter reasoning, for agent work where thinking tokens cost time, and BottleCap's 4-bit GGUF runs in about 19 GB. The main limits are the licence, which needs a paid licence above 100 people or 1,000,000 USD revenue, a gated main repository, and no safety results or training-data description.
Before you call either
Kimi K3
- Start it with SGLang on a node of 8 B300s, sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path moonshotai/Kimi-K3 --tp-size 8 --context-length 65536 --mem-fraction-static 0.82 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 --tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --port 30000
- Use the kimi_k3 tool-call and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, and validate tool-call arguments against the schema, since vLLM's recipe says K3 sometimes emits a format its parser doesn't expect
- Pass the whole assistant message back every turn, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, or output becomes unstable
- Thinking is always on; set reasoning_effort to low or high when max is too slow
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, with top-p 0.95 for single-step tasks and 1.0 for agentic ones
- Don't hand an ongoing session from another model to K3, and state boundaries in the system prompt, since Moonshot warns it can act on its own when intent is unclear
- Without the hardware, call it through Moonshot's API or an inference provider listed on its Hugging Face page
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Check the licence first, an organisation with 100 or more people or 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue needs a commercial licence from BottleCap
- For files without the gate use
llama-server -hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17.4 GB - On vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml, and on SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Set
reasoning_effort(xhigh, medium or low) in chat_template_kwargs, any other value makes the template raise an error - Keep the base's sampling (temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the GGUF card says greedy decoding can loop
- The GGUFs carry an MTP head, and llama.cpp builds without MTP support for this architecture may refuse to load them with a missing blk.64 tensor
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi K3 or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)?
Kimi K3 scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on reach, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Kimi K3 or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3
- BigBang-v1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3 vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-k3-vs-thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3.json·/api/v1/tools/thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-k3 thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-k3", "b": "thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key