Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents on a 24 GB GPU or Mac that want a permissive licence, wide runtime support and documented structured output, one tool call at a time
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Risk, 85 against 45
- Agent interface, 90 against 70
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No reply from OpenAI to any discussion since August 2025, and template reports wait unanswered
Best for Small teams and individuals running Qwen3.8-27B for agent or reasoning work who want shorter thinking traces on one 24 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 53 against 42
Watch for
PolyForm Small Business licence, free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | gpt-oss-20b | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 75 | gpt-oss-20b +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 85 | 45 | gpt-oss-20b +40 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 70 | gpt-oss-20b +20 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 42 | 53 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 69.9/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | gpt-oss-20b | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenAI | BottleCap AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | PolyForm-Small-Business-1.0.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is a cousin for reasoning, coding and single tool calls with structured output, under plain Apache 2.0. It needs about 17 GB with a working context, and five inference providers serve it. The main risks are that it trails o4-mini at keeping system instructions above user ones, and OpenAI hasn't answered a report since August 2025.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
A Qwen3.8-27B with shorter reasoning, for agent work where thinking tokens cost time, and BottleCap's 4-bit GGUF runs in about 19 GB. The main limits are the licence, which needs a paid licence above 100 people or 1,000,000 USD revenue, a gated main repository, and no safety results or training-data description.
Before you call either
gpt-oss-20b
- Start it with
ollama run gpt-oss:20b(the build that fits the reference machine), orvllm serve openai/gpt-oss-20bwith a current vLLM release rather than the card's pinned vllm==0.10.1+gptoss wheel - Use the harmony format through the chat template or openai-harmony; OpenAI says the model doesn't work correctly without it
- Parse tool calls and reasoning with openai-harmony; calls come on the commentary channel ending in
<|call|>, reasoning on the analysis channel - Set effort with
Reasoning: high(or low, medium) in the system message, orreasoning_effortin the template; medium is the default - Ask for JSON by putting a JSON Schema under
# Response Formatsin the developer message - Drop earlier reasoning after a final answer but pass it back after tool calls, and don't show the analysis channel to users
- Expect one tool call per turn; run several in sequence rather than in parallel
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Check the licence first, an organisation with 100 or more people or 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue needs a commercial licence from BottleCap
- For files without the gate use
llama-server -hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17.4 GB - On vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml, and on SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Set
reasoning_effort(xhigh, medium or low) in chat_template_kwargs, any other value makes the template raise an error - Keep the base's sampling (temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the GGUF card says greedy decoding can loop
- The GGUFs carry an MTP head, and llama.cpp builds without MTP support for this architecture may refuse to load them with a missing blk.64 tensor
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, gpt-oss-20b or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)?
gpt-oss-20b scores 69.9 (B) on agent readiness against ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)'s 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with gpt-oss-20b or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- BigBang-v1 vs gpt-oss-20b
- BigBang-v1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs gpt-oss-20b
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs gpt-oss-20b
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs gpt-oss-20b
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs gpt-oss-20b
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs Granite 4.2 3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kolibri-1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- gpt-oss-20b vs occamy-1.0
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-oss-20b.json·/api/v1/tools/thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-oss-20b thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-oss-20b", "b": "thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key