Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No released vLLM or SGLang ran it on 24 October 2026; only llama.cpp b11861 from that day did
Best for Small teams and individuals running Qwen3.8-27B for agent or reasoning work who want shorter thinking traces on one 24 GB GPU or Mac.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 40
- Risk, 45 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 53 against 41
Watch for
PolyForm Small Business licence, free commercially only below 100 people and 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 75 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 35 | 45 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 53 | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | MiniMax | BottleCap AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) | PolyForm-Small-Business-1.0.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-23 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights, and vLLM and SGLang support was pre-release on 24 October 2026. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
A Qwen3.8-27B with shorter reasoning, for agent work where thinking tokens cost time, and BottleCap's 4-bit GGUF runs in about 19 GB. The main limits are the licence, which needs a paid licence above 100 people or 1,000,000 USD revenue, a gated main repository, and no safety results or training-data description.
Before you call either
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM's nightly image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Check the licence first, an organisation with 100 or more people or 1,000,000 USD (2019) revenue needs a commercial licence from BottleCap
- For files without the gate use
llama-server -hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, about 17.4 GB - On vLLM use
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml, and on SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Set
reasoning_effort(xhigh, medium or low) in chat_template_kwargs, any other value makes the template raise an error - Keep the base's sampling (temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20), the GGUF card says greedy decoding can loop
- The GGUFs carry an MTP head, and llama.cpp builds without MTP support for this architecture may refuse to load them with a missing blk.64 tensor
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)?
ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- occamy-1.0 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Recursive Flint vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minimax-m3-1-flash thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "b": "thinkingcap-qwen3-8-27b"}at/mcp, no key