Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct scores 58 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3260 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash D

Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.

Ahead on

  • Capability, 64 against 39
  • Agent interface, 70 against 60
  • Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 36

Watch for

No released vLLM or SGLang ran it on 24 October 2026; only llama.cpp b11861 from that day did

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct C

Best for An agent with 24 GB or more to spare that wants a faster, stronger local reader of images, documents and video than the 8B model

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 40
  • Risk, 55 against 35

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5

Watch for

No safety evaluation, agent-use guidance or security contact

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMiniMax-M3.1-FlashQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructEdge
Capability35%356439MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +25
Reach25%254095Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct +55
Risk20%203555Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct +20
Agent interface10%107060MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +10
Documentation and upkeep10%104136MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +5
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 50.5/100C 58/100

Facts side by side

FactMiniMax-M3.1-FlashQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue)Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-232025-11-01
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.3/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights, and vLLM and SGLang support was pre-release on 24 October 2026. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

A mid-sized vision-language cousin for screenshots, documents, charts and video that runs fast for its size, with about 3B active parameters. It needs about 23 GB for Alibaba's Q4_K_M GGUF with its vision file, loads in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0, and three providers host it. With no published safety work, add guardrails before it drives a GUI.

Before you call either

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

  1. Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
  2. On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM's nightly image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
  3. Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
  4. --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
  5. Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
  6. On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
  7. For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
  8. Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

  1. Start it with llama-server -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, or ollama run qwen3-vl:30b-a3b-instruct
  2. In Ollama the plain qwen3-vl:30b tag is the Thinking edition, so name 30b-a3b-instruct
  3. With the GGUF, load the mmproj vision file too, or images won't be read
  4. Parse tool calls as JSON inside <tool_call> tags, or use SGLang's --tool-call-parser qwen
  5. Use the shipped sampling, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and top_k 20, from generation_config.json
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
  7. vLLM needs 0.11.0 or later, Transformers 4.57.0 or later and llama.cpp b6907 or later

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct?

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct scores 58 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with MiniMax-M3.1-Flash or Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.