Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct's 58 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

Hy3 B

Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0

Ahead on

  • Capability, 57 against 39
  • Risk, 60 against 55
  • Agent interface, 75 against 60
  • Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 36

Watch for

597.6 GB in BF16, 299.9 GB in FP8 and 168.5 GB at the smallest 4-bit build

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct C

Best for An agent with 24 GB or more to spare that wants a faster, stronger local reader of images, documents and video than the 8B model

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 70

Watch for

No safety evaluation, agent-use guidance or security contact

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHy3Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructEdge
Capability35%355739Hy3 +18
Reach25%257095Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct +25
Risk20%206055Hy3 +5
Agent interface10%107560Hy3 +15
Documentation and upkeep10%105636Hy3 +20
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 62.6/100C 58/100

Facts side by side

FactHy3Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorTencent (Hy team)Alibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-07-202025-11-01
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Hy3

Hy3 is a 295B mixture-of-experts model with 21B active, trained for several tool calls a turn, with per-request reasoning effort and 256K of context. It needs an 8-GPU server for FP8 or about 200 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risks are no safety evaluation or agent guidance, and no file changes or replies since July.

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

A mid-sized vision-language cousin for screenshots, documents, charts and video that runs fast for its size, with about 3B active parameters. It needs about 23 GB for Alibaba's Q4_K_M GGUF with its vision file, loads in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0, and three providers host it. With no published safety work, add guardrails before it drives a GUI.

Before you call either

Hy3

  1. Start it with vLLM on 8 GPUs, vllm serve tencent/Hy3-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tool-call-parser hy_v3 --reasoning-parser hy_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name hy3
  2. In SGLang use --tool-call-parser hunyuan --reasoning-parser hunyuan, as the card shows
  3. Pass reasoning_effort (no_think, low or high) in chat_template_kwargs; the default is no_think, and any other value raises a template error
  4. With the vLLM reasoning parser the chain of thought comes back in message.reasoning and the answer in message.content
  5. Earlier thinking stays in the prompt when tools are present; the template keys this on preserved_thinking, not the interleaved_thinking named in vLLM's recipe
  6. Use temperature 0.9 and top_p 1.0, the card's recommended sampling
  7. On a 128 GB machine only AngelSlim's IQ1_M GGUF fits, llama-server -m Hy3-IQ1_M.gguf -ctk q8_0 -ctv q8_0 -fa on -c 65536, with llama.cpp b11768 or later; at 89.4 GB × 1.2 it sits right at the 107.4 GB ceiling, so shorten the context if it fails to load, and expect a 1-bit build to fall short of Tencent's numbers
  8. Without the hardware, call it through Featherless AI or DeepInfra via Hugging Face's inference providers

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

  1. Start it with llama-server -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, or ollama run qwen3-vl:30b-a3b-instruct
  2. In Ollama the plain qwen3-vl:30b tag is the Thinking edition, so name 30b-a3b-instruct
  3. With the GGUF, load the mmproj vision file too, or images won't be read
  4. Parse tool calls as JSON inside <tool_call> tags, or use SGLang's --tool-call-parser qwen
  5. Use the shipped sampling, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and top_k 20, from generation_config.json
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
  7. vLLM needs 0.11.0 or later, Transformers 4.57.0 or later and llama.cpp b6907 or later

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Hy3 or Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct?

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct's 58 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct leads on reach.

Other comparisons with Hy3 or Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.