Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Hy3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0
Ahead on
- Capability, 57 against 17
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 37
Watch for
597.6 GB in BF16, 299.9 GB in FP8 and 168.5 GB at the smallest 4-bit build
Best for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 70
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba and no inference provider found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-0.8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 57 | 17 | Hy3 +40 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 80 | Qwen3.5-0.8B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Hy3 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | Hy3 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 37 | Hy3 +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.6/100 | D 46.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Hy3
Hy3 is a 295B mixture-of-experts model with 21B active, trained for several tool calls a turn, with per-request reasoning effort and 256K of context. It needs an 8-GPU server for FP8 or about 200 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risks are no safety evaluation or agent guidance, and no file changes or replies since July.
Qwen3.5-0.8B
A tiny vision-language cousin for prototypes, fine-tuning and light local steps such as routing, tagging or reading an image, running in under 2 GB in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The main risk is neglect, with no hosted option, safety results or answers from Alibaba since March.
Before you call either
Hy3
- Start it with vLLM on 8 GPUs, vllm serve tencent/Hy3-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tool-call-parser hy_v3 --reasoning-parser hy_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name hy3
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser hunyuan --reasoning-parser hunyuan, as the card shows
- Pass reasoning_effort (no_think, low or high) in chat_template_kwargs; the default is no_think, and any other value raises a template error
- With the vLLM reasoning parser the chain of thought comes back in message.reasoning and the answer in message.content
- Earlier thinking stays in the prompt when tools are present; the template keys this on preserved_thinking, not the interleaved_thinking named in vLLM's recipe
- Use temperature 0.9 and top_p 1.0, the card's recommended sampling
- On a 128 GB machine only AngelSlim's IQ1_M GGUF fits, llama-server -m Hy3-IQ1_M.gguf -ctk q8_0 -ctv q8_0 -fa on -c 65536, with llama.cpp b11768 or later; at 89.4 GB × 1.2 it sits right at the 107.4 GB ceiling, so shorten the context if it fails to load, and expect a 1-bit build to fall short of Tencent's numbers
- Without the hardware, call it through Featherless AI or DeepInfra via Hugging Face's inference providers
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:0.8b, orqwen3.5:0.8b-q8_0at 1.0 GB - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hy3 or Qwen3.5-0.8B?
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Hy3 or Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- BigBang-v1 vs Hy3
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Hy3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Hy3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Hy3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs Inkling
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hy3.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hy3 qwen3-5-0-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hy3", "b": "qwen3-5-0-8b"}at/mcp, no key