# Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md (~5,650 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3.5-0.8B: D 46.7, rank #97 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Capability, 57 against 17; Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 37.
- Qwen3.5-0.8B, good for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU Ahead on Reach, 80 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 17 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 37 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-03-02 |