Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
LongCat-2.5 scores 50.5 (D) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 46 against 37
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 35
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba and no inference provider found
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Qwen3.5-0.8B +45
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 80
Memory earns the full 30, since LM Studio's Q4_K_M build with its projector is 0.73 GB (0.88 GB with the fifth added) and Ollama's Q8_0 build was 1.0 GB, both far within 16 GB. Alibaba publishes no quantised 0.8B, so builds scores 0. Runtimes reach the 25 cap on llama.cpp, Ollama (through its pinned llama.cpp), vLLM, SGLang, LM Studio and Transformers. Apache 2.0 with nothing added gives terms 15 and the ungated repository download 10. Hosted too scores 0, as the Hub maps no inference provider to this size. 30+25+0+15+10+0 = 80.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +15
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 60
The template ships in the repository (20) and the model was trained for tool use with several calls per turn in the template (20). Tool-calling format gets 10, because the card names the qwen3_coder parser but leaves the format to the template. Reasoning control scores 0, since the card shows how to turn thinking on but not where the reasoning comes back. 262,144 tokens is native (10). Structured output scores 0, as nothing documents JSON output for the model. 20+10+20+0+0+10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep LongCat-2.5 +9
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 37
The card covers six of the seven items, missing only a cut-off (17), because it states the intended uses and warns about thinking loops. Training data is a general description without a cut-off (5). The files last changed on 2 March 2026, 248 days before this check, within a year (5). No Qwen member has answered any of the 15 discussions that aren't pull requests (0). Qwen3-0.6B stays in its own repository without a dated note (5), and a template fix and the missing generation_config.json wait unanswered (5). 17+5+5+0+5+5 = 37.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
Qwen3.5-0.8B 55
Safetensors only with no remote code gives file safety its 25, and files in the Qwen organisation the publisher's GitHub links to, each with a hash on the Hub, give provenance 15. The Apache 2.0 licence carries none of the deductions, so licence risk keeps 15. Safety evaluation, agent guidance and a security programme score 0, since the card has no safety results or agent cautions and no reporting route was found. The Qwen3.5 blog and Alibaba's security response centre couldn't be read, so those are scored as absent and left open. 25+15+0+0+15+0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | Qwen3.5-0.8B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 80 | Qwen3.5-0.8B +45 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | LongCat-2.5 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 37 | LongCat-2.5 +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | D 46.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
Qwen3.5-0.8B
A tiny vision-language model for prototypes, fine-tuning and narrow local steps such as routing, tagging or reading an image. It runs in about 1 GB at 4 or 8 bits in six runtimes under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The card has no safety results, and Qwen has answered none of its discussions.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:0.8b, orqwen3.5:0.8b-q8_0at 1.0 GB - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or Qwen3.5-0.8B?
LongCat-2.5 scores 50.5 (D) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 qwen3-5-0-8b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "qwen3-5-0-8b"}at/mcp, no key