Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B scores 56.8 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 35
- Risk, 65 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 55 against 46
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +55
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 90
Memory earns the full 30, since NVIDIA's own 2.84 GB GGUF needs under 4 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes earn the full 25 from released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang, Transformers, Ollama and LM Studio. Builds earn 15 for NVIDIA's FP8 and GGUF. Terms earn 10, since the Nemotron licence is custom even though it's free for commercial use with no threshold or use policy. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 0, as no Hugging Face provider serves it and no NVIDIA hosting was found.
Documentation and upkeep Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +9
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 55
The model card earns 20, all seven items with limitations in the linked subcard. Training data earns 20, datasets listed with sources and dates, crawled sets with token counts, a cut-off and published NVIDIA datasets, though most synthetic sizes are undisclosed. Last change earns 5, as the files last changed on 20 March 2026, and TensorRT-LLM's Nemotron-H commits since 14 October touch MoE, NVFP4 and Puzzle paths this dense model doesn't use, in release candidates or no release. Responsiveness earns 0, with no NVIDIA reply to any of six questions, re-counted on 4 November. Version policy earns 5 as a first release. File health earns 5, since the LICENSE file is empty, reports and fixes wait without a reply, and the card's Transformers snippet names a repository that isn't public.
Risk Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +5
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 65
File safety earns 15, safetensors and GGUF only but with 10 off because the documented commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository. Provenance earns 15, files in NVIDIA's linked organisation with a hash for every file. Safety evaluation earns 0, no results. Agent guidance earns 10, subcards that name prompt injection and the safeguards to add, without an instruction hierarchy. Licence risk keeps all 15, since the switch to the Nemotron licence happened on release day. The security programme earns 10 for the reporting route on the card and NVIDIA's public bulletins.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 70
The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10 of 25, as only the template shows the format and the parser name appears only in a serving command. Trained tool calling earns 20, with tool-use benchmarks and data and several calls per turn in the template. Structured output earns 0, not claimed or documented. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request with a parser that returns the reasoning apart. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +55 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 55 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 56.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A 3.97-billion-parameter reasoning model with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, which runs in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files unchanged and questions unanswered since March 2026.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B scores 56.8 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 nemotron-3-nano-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-4b"}at/mcp, no key