Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 55
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 55
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 27 | 25 | MiniCPM5-2B +2 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 55 | MiniCPM5-2B +42 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | C 56.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A tiny reasoning cousin with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, running in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF on almost any machine. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files untouched and questions unanswered since March.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b nemotron-3-nano-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-4b"}at/mcp, no key