Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 55 against 31
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or a Mac, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 65 | 50 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 55 | 31 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.8/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-03-16 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A tiny reasoning cousin with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, running in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF on almost any machine. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files untouched and questions unanswered since March.
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
A mid-size coding and terminal-agent cousin with about 3B active parameters, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It runs in about 24 GB from Ornith's MLX 4-bit build or 32 GB from its GGUF. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies to 35 reports.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:35b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144as the card gives it - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for general tasks and temperature 1.0 to reproduce the card's benchmarks
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-35B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3 Nano 4B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B?
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3 Nano 4B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-nano-4b-vs-ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-nano-4b ornith-1-5-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-nano-4b", "b": "ornith-1-5-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key