Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
DeepSeek-V3.2 scores 58.6 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with an eight-GPU server who want an MIT agent model with broad runtime support, or agents calling it through a hosted provider
Ahead on
- Capability, 69 against 25
Watch for
689.5 GB of FP8 files and no smaller build from DeepSeek or a runtime library, far beyond 107.4 GB
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 60
- Risk, 65 against 50
- Agent interface, 70 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 55 against 34
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 69 | 25 | DeepSeek-V3.2 +44 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 70 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 34 | 55 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.6/100 | C 56.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-12-01 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 is an MIT-licensed reasoning model trained for parallel tool calls, with thinking chosen per request, for long agent work. It needs about 690 GB of FP8 files, eight 80 GB GPUs in vLLM's recipe and prompts built from DeepSeek's Python. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes since December 2025 and no safety evaluation.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A tiny reasoning cousin with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, running in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF on almost any machine. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files untouched and questions unanswered since March.
Before you call either
DeepSeek-V3.2
- Start it with vLLM's recipe, vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v32 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser deepseek_v32 --reasoning-parser deepseek_v3
- It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine at any qualifying build, so call DeepInfra (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2) or SambaNova (DeepSeek-V3.2) instead
- Outside vLLM, build prompts with encoding/encoding_dsv32.py and wrap parse_message_from_completion_text in error handling, since DeepSeek says it handles well-formed output only
- Pick thinking or chat with thinking_mode, and read the reasoning from reasoning_content
- Send developer messages only for search-agent prompts, the only use DeepSeek gives that role
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 and keep prompts within 128K tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek-V3.2 or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
DeepSeek-V3.2 scores 58.6 (C) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek-V3.2 or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v3-2.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v3-2 nemotron-3-nano-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v3-2", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-4b"}at/mcp, no key