Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with an eight-GPU server who want an MIT agent model with broad runtime support, or agents calling it through a hosted provider
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
689.5 GB of FP8 files and no smaller build from DeepSeek or a runtime library, far beyond 107.4 GB
Best for Researchers and students working on documents, Korean or multimodal agents who don't need commercial rights
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 60
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 50 against 34
Watch for
Research and education only. No commercial use of the model or its output
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface EXAONE 4.5 33B +25
DeepSeek-V3.2 60
The chat template earns 10, as the format exists only as Python code to run. The tool-calling format earns 10 because DeepSeek documents the DSML format in code but names no runtime parser, which only vLLM's own recipe does. Trained tool calling earns the full 20 for several calls in one block. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented. Reasoning control earns 10 for thinking or chat mode per request with reasoning_content returned. Context earns 10 for 128K trained tokens.
EXAONE 4.5 33B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,930 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card's vLLM command names the parser, hermes with auto tool choice, and its agentic example calls tools from MCP servers through the OpenAI-compatible API, so declaration and return follow that API. Trained tool calling 20, the card reports agentic tool use among its language results and shows an agent run with several tool servers, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking is on by default and the card says to set it false for the non-reasoning mode, with an example of each. Context 10, 262,144 tokens per the card's configuration table and config.json, and the card's serve commands run at that length. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Documentation and upkeep EXAONE 4.5 33B +16
DeepSeek-V3.2 34
The model card earns 14 when read with DeepSeek's own V3.2 model card PDF, which adds intended use and a parameter count, leaving languages and a knowledge cut-off missing. Training data earns 5, a general description with no cut-off. Last change earns 5, as nothing in the repository has changed since 1 December 2025 (338 days on 4 November) and DeepSeek's deepseek-recipe has no V3.2 code. Responsiveness earns nothing, with no reply from a deepseek-ai member in any of the 40 most recent discussions. Version policy earns 5 for earlier versions kept apart without dated notes. File health earns 5 because loading and parsing reports wait without a reply.
EXAONE 4.5 33B 50
Model card 20, Uses (the quickstart's question answering, document and agent examples), limitations, the architecture, the parameters, the context, the languages (in the metadata) and a knowledge cut-off of December 2024 are all on the card. Training data 5, A knowledge cut-off and one line on excluding personal, harmful and biased content, with no sources or sizes. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 6 July 2026 (dependencies moved to official releases), 127 days before this check, and the FP8 repository on 9 August, 93 days. Responsiveness 0, none of the 5 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (13 April to 4 May 2026) has a reply from an LGAI-EXAONE member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, EXAONE 4.0 and 4.0.1 stay in their own repositories and 4.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens, and a July commit moved the dependencies to released versions. 20 + 5 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Reach EXAONE 4.5 33B +5
DeepSeek-V3.2 60
Memory earns nothing, because the only build from DeepSeek or a runtime's library is the 689.5 GB FP8 release, which needs about 827 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes earn the full 25 for released model code in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers, and for Ollama 0.40.14, whose llama.cpp pin (b11963) carries the deepseek32 architecture with no gate in Ollama's server code, though its library entry stays retired; nothing from LM Studio. Builds earn 10 for the single FP8 precision DeepSeek publishes. Terms earn the full 15 for MIT with nothing added, and download the full 10 since the repository isn't gated. Hosted earns nothing, since DeepSeek's own API moved to V4 on 24 April 2026 and Hugging Face maps only DeepInfra as live for it on 4 November (Novita and Featherless in error), where the line needs two providers. Fireworks' model page says Serverless Not Supported and lists it only for on-demand deployment on dedicated GPUs, which is renting the hardware rather than calling a served model.
EXAONE 4.5 33B 65
Memory 20, the smallest build at 4 bits is LG's IQ4_XS GGUF, 18.03 GB with the 2.57 GB projector, and 20.60 GB × 1.2 = 24.7 GB, within 32 GB. Without the projector, for text only, it would fit 24 GB. Runtimes 15, Released vLLM 0.33.0 has exaone4_5.py, Transformers 5.22.2 has the exaone4_5 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with LG's own GGUF. Three at 5 each. Builds 15, LG publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an AWQ build and an FP8 build. Terms 5, Research and educational use only. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no click-through, though the licence says downloading is acceptance. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API that serves it. 20 + 15 + 15 + 5 + 10 + 0 = 65.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek-V3.2 | EXAONE 4.5 33B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 65 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 85 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 34 | 50 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 58.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek-V3.2 | EXAONE 4.5 33B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | LG AI Research |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | EXAONE AI Model License Agreement 1.2 - NC (research and education only) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2025-12-01 | 2026-07-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 is an MIT-licensed reasoning model trained for parallel tool calls, with thinking chosen per request, for long agent work. It needs about 690 GB of FP8 files, eight 80 GB GPUs in vLLM's recipe and prompts built from DeepSeek's Python. The main risk is neglect, with no file changes since December 2025 and no safety evaluation.
EXAONE 4.5 33B
A well-documented vision-language model with a full set of builds, tool calling, switchable reasoning, a 256K context and a stated knowledge cut-off. The licence decides whether you can use it: research and education only, output included, and LG can change the terms. Nothing answered on the repository and no safety results.
Before you call either
DeepSeek-V3.2
- Start it with vLLM's recipe, vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v32 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser deepseek_v32 --reasoning-parser deepseek_v3
- It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine at any qualifying build, so call DeepInfra (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2) or deploy it on Fireworks instead
- Outside vLLM, build prompts with encoding/encoding_dsv32.py and wrap parse_message_from_completion_text in error handling, since DeepSeek says it handles well-formed output only
- Pick thinking or chat with thinking_mode, and read the reasoning from reasoning_content
- Send developer messages only for search-agent prompts, the only use DeepSeek gives that role
- Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 and keep prompts within 128K tokens
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Don't use it, or anything it writes, commercially. The licence covers the output too
- Serve it with vLLM and
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes - Set
enable_thinkingfalse for a direct answer. Thinking is on by default - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and presence_penalty 1.5 in general, and temperature 0.6 with top_k 20 for documents and Korean
- For llama.cpp, load a projector file from LG's GGUF repository with the weights for image input
- Its knowledge stops at December 2024
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek-V3.2 or EXAONE 4.5 33B?
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek-V3.2's 58.6 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek-V3.2 or EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Agents-A1-4B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Arete-27B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Arete-27B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- BigBang-v1 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Carbon-X vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cola2 vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cola2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Devstral Small 2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kronos
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Devstral Small 2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-120b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-20b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling-Small
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kolibri-1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kronos
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna M.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna S 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LBS-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-1.7B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Mistral Large 4
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs occamy-1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Recursive Flint
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-exaone-4-5-33b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v3-2.json·/api/v1/tools/exaone-4-5-33b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v3-2 exaone-4-5-33b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v3-2", "b": "exaone-4-5-33b"}at/mcp, no key