Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and students working on documents, Korean or multimodal agents who don't need commercial rights
Ahead on
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 50 against 40
Watch for
Research and education only. No commercial use of the model or its output
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next C
Best for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Two licences to satisfy, UkisAI's US$1M revenue limit and Qwen's separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface EXAONE 4.5 33B +25
EXAONE 4.5 33B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,930 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card's vLLM command names the parser, hermes with auto tool choice, and its agentic example calls tools from MCP servers through the OpenAI-compatible API, so declaration and return follow that API. Trained tool calling 20, the card reports agentic tool use among its language results and shows an agent run with several tool servers, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking is on by default and the card says to set it false for the non-reasoning mode, with an example of each. Context 10, 262,144 tokens per the card's configuration table and config.json, and the card's serve commands run at that length. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 60
Chat template 20, the base's Jinja file. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format is only in the template and the card's two commands name different parsers. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn and agentic post-training. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the card shows how to set reasoning_effort but not how to turn thinking off or where the reasoning comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Documentation and upkeep EXAONE 4.5 33B +10
EXAONE 4.5 33B 50
Model card 20, Uses (the quickstart's question answering, document and agent examples), limitations, the architecture, the parameters, the context, the languages (in the metadata) and a knowledge cut-off of December 2024 are all on the card. Training data 5, A knowledge cut-off and one line on excluding personal, harmful and biased content, with no sources or sizes. Last change 10, the main repository last changed on 6 July 2026 (dependencies moved to official releases), 127 days before this check, and the FP8 repository on 9 August, 93 days. Responsiveness 0, none of the 5 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (13 April to 4 May 2026) has a reply from an LGAI-EXAONE member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, EXAONE 4.0 and 4.0.1 stay in their own repositories and 4.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older cards that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 262,144 tokens, and a July commit moved the dependencies to released versions. 20 + 5 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 50.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 40
Model card 5 of 20, intended use and context only. Training data 5, a general description with no cut-off. Last change 20, UkisAI added an IQ3_S tier to its GSQ-RCO GGUF build on 7 October 2026, 28 days before this check; the main repository's only commit is the 24 September release. Responsiveness 0, UkisAI answered none of 3 discussions. Version policy 5, a first release, renamed without a note. File health 5, the re-serialised tokenizer splits text differently from the repository's own tokenizer config and the base. 5 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 40.
Risk EXAONE 4.5 33B +5
EXAONE 4.5 33B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the LGAI-EXAONE organisation (LG AI Research on the Hub), which the card's GitHub repository shares a name with and the licence in the repository is LG's (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitation section lists inappropriate, biased, incorrect and outdated answers and tells users not to try to induce harmful output. Licence risk 5, 15 less 5 for field-of-use limits beyond the law (no commercial use, no building competing models) and 5 for terms the licensor can change or revoke (LG may amend the agreement at any time, and the licence is revocable). Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a support contact, and www.lgresearch.ai has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 = 50.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 45
File safety 25, safetensors only and no code in the repository, though the card's vLLM command passes trust-remote-code. Provenance 15, the files are in the account UkisAI's site links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 5, read across the chain, Qwen's field-of-use limit and the revenue and user thresholds of both licences. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw was found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | EXAONE 4.5 33B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 65 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 50 | 40 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 54.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | EXAONE 4.5 33B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | LG AI Research | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | EXAONE AI Model License Agreement 1.2 - NC (research and education only) | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-06 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
EXAONE 4.5 33B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
EXAONE 4.5 33B
A well-documented vision-language model with a full set of builds, tool calling, switchable reasoning, a 256K context and a stated knowledge cut-off. The licence decides whether you can use it: research and education only, output included, and LG can change the terms. Nothing answered on the repository and no safety results.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A mixture-of-experts vision-language model, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and long agent sessions on a multi-GPU server. Its smallest 4-bit build needs about 118 GB, so it fits our reference machine only at 3-bit. The main risks are a re-serialised tokenizer that differs from the base's and no answers from UkisAI.
Before you call either
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Don't use it, or anything it writes, commercially. The licence covers the output too
- Serve it with vLLM and
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes - Set
enable_thinkingfalse for a direct answer. Thinking is on by default - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and presence_penalty 1.5 in general, and temperature 0.6 with top_k 20 for documents and Korean
- For llama.cpp, load a projector file from LG's GGUF repository with the weights for image input
- Its knowledge stops at December 2024
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a multi-GPU node use
vllm serve ukisai/Swift1.5-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parser the base's recipes and the card's SGLang command use - The card's vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code and the old repository name, neither is needed
- On our reference machine only UkisAI's GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF (84.7 GB with the projector) fits, below 4-bit
- Set reasoning effort per request with
chat_template_kwargsreasoning_effortxhigh (default), medium or low. UkisAI's own runs lose about 2.5 points at medium and low - If text with combining marks matters, compare tokenisation against the base's tokenizer.json before trusting outputs
- Check both licences before commercial use, UkisAI's stops at US$1M gross annual revenue and Qwen's needs a separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with EXAONE 4.5 33B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Arete-27B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Arete-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cola2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cola2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-120b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-20b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling-Small
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kolibri-1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kronos
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna M.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna S 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LBS-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-1.7B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Mistral Large 4
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs occamy-1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Recursive Flint
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/exaone-4-5-33b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/exaone-4-5-33b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare exaone-4-5-33b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "exaone-4-5-33b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key