Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Researchers and students working on documents, Korean or multimodal agents who don't need commercial rights
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 55
- Risk, 50 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
Research and education only. No commercial use of the model or its output
Best for Pipelines with an NVIDIA GPU that need long scanned or rendered documents parsed in one pass, with page order, cross-page tables and boxes kept
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Loading runs Baidu's code, remote code in Transformers or a prebuilt SGLang fork from the repository, and the save_results path calls eval on model output
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach EXAONE 4.5 33B +10
EXAONE 4.5 33B 65
Memory 20, the smallest build at 4 bits is LG's IQ4_XS GGUF, 18.03 GB with the 2.57 GB projector, and 20.60 GB × 1.2 = 24.7 GB, within 32 GB. Without the projector, for text only, it would fit 24 GB. Runtimes 15, Released vLLM 0.33.0 has exaone4_5.py, Transformers 5.22.2 has the exaone4_5 model, and llama.cpp b12242 has the architecture, with LG's own GGUF. Three at 5 each. Builds 15, LG publishes GGUF at five quantised precisions, an AWQ build and an FP8 build. Terms 5, Research and educational use only. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for all four repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no click-through, though the licence says downloading is acceptance. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API that serves it. 20 + 15 + 15 + 5 + 10 + 0 = 65.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 55
Memory earns the full 30, since the only build is 6.69 GB of BF16 weights that need about 8 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes score 0. Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.1 know the first Unlimited-OCR but not the sparse attention this one adds, Baidu's own routes are remote code in Transformers and a customised SGLang wheel, llama.cpp b12111 has nothing for it, so Ollama has nothing either, and LM Studio couldn't be checked. Builds score 0, as Baidu publishes no quantised build (16 exist, all by others). Terms get 15 for MIT with nothing added. Download gets 10 for an ungated repository, and hosted too 0, with no inference provider mapped and the card's Baidu Cloud line unconfirmed.
Agent interface EXAONE 4.5 33B +10
EXAONE 4.5 33B 85
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,930 characters). Tool-calling format 25, the card's vLLM command names the parser, hermes with auto tool choice, and its agentic example calls tools from MCP servers through the OpenAI-compatible API, so declaration and return follow that API. Trained tool calling 20, the card reports agentic tool use among its language results and shows an agent run with several tool servers, and the template renders every call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking is on by default and the card says to set it false for the non-reasoning mode, with an example of each. Context 10, 262,144 tokens per the card's configuration table and config.json, and the card's serve commands run at that length. 20 + 25 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 85.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 75
Read for a document parser, the tool-calling, trained tool calling and structured-output lines stand for what it takes and returns. Baidu documents the page images, the prompt, the request settings and the block output, and ships a converter for the server's output (25). It was trained to read many pages in one request (20). The block format with classes, boxes and HTML tables, and its conversion to Markdown, are documented with how to get them (15). The prompt is built in code, with no Jinja template in the repository (10). Reasoning control scores 0, and the context 5, trained at up to 64K tokens.
Risk EXAONE 4.5 33B +5
EXAONE 4.5 33B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the LGAI-EXAONE organisation (LG AI Research on the Hub), which the card's GitHub repository shares a name with and the licence in the repository is LG's (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions: the limitation section lists inappropriate, biased, incorrect and outdated answers and tells users not to try to induce harmful output. Licence risk 5, 15 less 5 for field-of-use limits beyond the law (no commercial use, no building competing models) and 5 for terms the licensor can change or revoke (LG may amend the agreement at any time, and the licence is revocable). Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a support contact, and www.lgresearch.ai has no security.txt. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 = 50.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 45
File safety gets 15, safetensors only but loaded with trust_remote_code or through a prebuilt SGLang wheel from the repository. Provenance gets 15 for files in Baidu's verified organisation, linked from its GitHub organisation, with hashes for every file. Licence risk keeps 15, since MIT has none of the deductions. Safety evaluation, agent guidance and the security programme score 0, with no safety results, no cautions about use and no security contact found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | EXAONE 4.5 33B | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 55 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 45 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | EXAONE 4.5 33B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 54.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | EXAONE 4.5 33B | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | LG AI Research | Baidu |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | EXAONE AI Model License Agreement 1.2 - NC (research and education only) | MIT (Hub metadata; the Hugging Face repository has no LICENSE file, and the GitHub code repository's LICENSE is the MIT text, copyright 2026 Baidu) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-06 | 2026-10-26 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
How the scores have moved
EXAONE 4.5 33B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
EXAONE 4.5 33B
A well-documented vision-language model with a full set of builds, tool calling, switchable reasoning, a 256K context and a stated knowledge cut-off. The licence decides whether you can use it: research and education only, output included, and LG can change the terms. Nothing answered on the repository and no safety results.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
An MIT document parser of 3.3B parameters that reads up to hundreds of pages in one request and returns ordered layout blocks with boxes and HTML tables. ParseBench's independent run puts content faithfulness at 89.16 and charts at 1.06. It needs an NVIDIA GPU with about 12 GB and runs only through Baidu's remote code or its own SGLang build.
Before you call either
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Don't use it, or anything it writes, commercially. The licence covers the output too
- Serve it with vLLM and
--reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes - Set
enable_thinkingfalse for a direct answer. Thinking is on by default - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and presence_penalty 1.5 in general, and temperature 0.6 with top_k 20 for documents and Korean
- For llama.cpp, load a projector file from LG's GGUF repository with the weights for image input
- Its knowledge stops at December 2024
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Quickest local run,
pip install torch==2.13.0 torchvision pillow transformers==4.52.1 huggingface-hub==0.36.0 tokenizers==0.21.4 addict==2.4.0 einops==0.8.2 easydict==1.13, thenAutoModel.from_pretrained("baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2", trust_remote_code=True, use_safetensors=True, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16).eval().cuda()andmodel.infer_multi(tokenizer, image_files=pages, output_path="out") - To serve it, download the repository, install
wheel/sglang-0.5.20.dev13+g75b9b06b02-py3-none-any.whlwith pymupdf and fastokens in a Python 3.10 venv, and startpython -m sglang.launch_server --model-path baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2 --chat-template unlimited-ocr --enable-custom-logit-processor --enable-streaming-session --disable-radix-cache --mem-fraction-static 0.7 --max-prefill-tokens 2048with the SGLANG_UOCR_ variables from the card - Send all pages of a document in one request, images first, then the text
<PAGE><image>repeated per page andMulti page parsing., with temperature 0, skip_special_tokens false, max_tokens of about 8,000 per page and the DeepseekOCRNoRepeatNGramLogitProcessor (ngram_size 35, window_size 1024 for several pages) - The output is layout blocks, not Markdown; run
utils/process_unlimitedOCR2.pyfrom github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR, orconvert(raw_output)in Python, to get Markdown with HTML tables - Render PDFs to images first (the card uses PyMuPDF at 300 DPI), keep save_results off for untrusted documents, and treat extracted text as untrusted before passing it to another model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2?
EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with EXAONE 4.5 33B or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Agents-A1-4B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Arete-27B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Arete-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- BigBang-v1 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Carbon-X vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Carbon-X vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Cola2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cola2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Devstral Small 2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-120b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs gpt-oss-20b
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Granite 4.2 8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Inkling-Small
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kolibri-1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Kronos
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna M.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna S 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LBS-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-1.7B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Mistral Large 4
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs occamy-1.0
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Recursive Flint
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-120b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling-Small vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kolibri-1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kronos vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna M.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-1.7B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- occamy-1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Recursive Flint vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Chandra OCR 2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-OCR 2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- HunyuanOCR 1.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LightOnOCR-3-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanonets-OCR2-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Surya OCR 2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs Xiaomi-OCR-0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/exaone-4-5-33b-vs-unlimited-ocr-2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/exaone-4-5-33b.json·/api/v1/tools/unlimited-ocr-2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare exaone-4-5-33b unlimited-ocr-2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "exaone-4-5-33b", "b": "unlimited-ocr-2"}at/mcp, no key