Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 and Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.8 (C) and 54.2 (C). Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 50
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Pipelines with an NVIDIA GPU that need long scanned or rendered documents parsed in one pass, with page order, cross-page tables and boxes kept
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
Watch for
Loading runs Baidu's code, remote code in Transformers or a prebuilt SGLang fork from the repository, and the save_results path calls eval on model output
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 +15
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 75
Read for a document parser, the tool-calling, trained tool calling and structured-output lines stand for what it takes and returns. Baidu documents the page images, the prompt, the request settings and the block output, and ships a converter for the server's output (25). It was trained to read many pages in one request (20). The block format with classes, boxes and HTML tables, and its conversion to Markdown, are documented with how to get them (15). The prompt is built in code, with no Jinja template in the repository (10). Reasoning control scores 0, and the context 5, trained at up to 64K tokens.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +6
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 50
The card covers intended use and the new attention, and misses limitations, parameters, context length, languages and a cut-off (5). Training data is described by mix and labelling with no datasets named and no cut-off (5). The card changed on 2 November 2026 and the SGLang wheel on 29 October (20). Baidu's uploader replied in 1 of the 5 Hub discussions, a few (5). The first model stays in its own repository without a note pointing here (5), and the files agree with the card (10).
Reach Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 55
Memory earns the full 30, since the only build is 6.69 GB of BF16 weights that need about 8 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes score 0. Released vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.1 know the first Unlimited-OCR but not the sparse attention this one adds, Baidu's own routes are remote code in Transformers and a customised SGLang wheel, llama.cpp b12111 has nothing for it, so Ollama has nothing either, and LM Studio couldn't be checked. Builds score 0, as Baidu publishes no quantised build (16 exist, all by others). Terms get 15 for MIT with nothing added. Download gets 10 for an ungated repository, and hosted too 0, with no inference provider mapped and the card's Baidu Cloud line unconfirmed.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 55 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 45 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 75 | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 50 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | C 54.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Baidu |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT (Hub metadata; the Hugging Face repository has no LICENSE file, and the GitHub code repository's LICENSE is the MIT text, copyright 2026 Baidu) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-26 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
How the scores have moved
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
An MIT document parser of 3.3B parameters that reads up to hundreds of pages in one request and returns ordered layout blocks with boxes and HTML tables. ParseBench's independent run puts content faithfulness at 89.16 and charts at 1.06. It needs an NVIDIA GPU with about 12 GB and runs only through Baidu's remote code or its own SGLang build.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Quickest local run,
pip install torch==2.13.0 torchvision pillow transformers==4.52.1 huggingface-hub==0.36.0 tokenizers==0.21.4 addict==2.4.0 einops==0.8.2 easydict==1.13, thenAutoModel.from_pretrained("baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2", trust_remote_code=True, use_safetensors=True, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16).eval().cuda()andmodel.infer_multi(tokenizer, image_files=pages, output_path="out") - To serve it, download the repository, install
wheel/sglang-0.5.20.dev13+g75b9b06b02-py3-none-any.whlwith pymupdf and fastokens in a Python 3.10 venv, and startpython -m sglang.launch_server --model-path baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2 --chat-template unlimited-ocr --enable-custom-logit-processor --enable-streaming-session --disable-radix-cache --mem-fraction-static 0.7 --max-prefill-tokens 2048with the SGLANG_UOCR_ variables from the card - Send all pages of a document in one request, images first, then the text
<PAGE><image>repeated per page andMulti page parsing., with temperature 0, skip_special_tokens false, max_tokens of about 8,000 per page and the DeepseekOCRNoRepeatNGramLogitProcessor (ngram_size 35, window_size 1024 for several pages) - The output is layout blocks, not Markdown; run
utils/process_unlimitedOCR2.pyfrom github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR, orconvert(raw_output)in Python, to get Markdown with HTML tables - Render PDFs to images first (the card uses PyMuPDF at 300 DPI), keep save_results off for untrusted documents, and treat extracted text as untrusted before passing it to another model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2?
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 and Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.8 (C) and 54.2 (C). Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Mistral Large 4 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- occamy-1.0 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Recursive Flint vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SmolLM3-3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 vs Xiaomi-OCR-0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-unlimited-ocr-2.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/unlimited-ocr-2.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 unlimited-ocr-2(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "unlimited-ocr-2"}at/mcp, no key