Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ripple-65B Preview
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 45
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 49
Watch for
574 GB in FP8 with no smaller build from inclusionAI, so no single machine under 690 GB of GPU memory runs it
Best for Teams with Blackwell GPUs or a DGX Spark who want an Apache 2.0 coding model to try for terminal and agentic coding work, and can run the publisher's code to serve it.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 45
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
Watch for
No released runtime runs the architecture, so running it means Ricursive's Python in SGLang 0.5.19 or Transformers' remote code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +15
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build. Runtimes 25, Released model code in Transformers 5.22.2 (bailing_hybrid), vLLM 0.33.0 (BailingMoeV3ForCausalLM, with ling3 tool and reasoning parsers), SGLang 0.5.23 (bailing_moe_v3.py, its bailing_hybrid config and MTP module) and llama.cpp b12242 (bailingmoe3), and Ollama, credited through its pinned llama.cpp as on the Ling-3.0-tiny listing: v0.40.16 sets LLAMA_CPP_VERSION to b12177. Builds 10, the release is FP8, the one quantised precision inclusionAI publishes for it. Terms 15, MIT in the card's metadata, with no use policy or other terms added on the card or in the repository. Download 10, the Hub API's model info gives gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, the Hub API's provider mapping is empty for this repository on 10 November 2026. 0 + 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.
Ripple-65B Preview 45
Memory 10 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Ricursive's NVFP4 at 57.2 GB, 68.7 GB with a fifth added, which is over 64 GB and fits our reference machine. Runtimes 0, no released runtime runs the ricursive architecture with its own code; Ricursive's SGLang plugin and Transformers' remote code don't count. Builds 10, one quantised precision (NVFP4) from Ricursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, Ricursive serves no API, Hugging Face maps no provider, Together AI's page says coming soon, and GMI Cloud's and OpenRouter's pages weren't read.
Agent interface Ripple-65B Preview +15
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared (JSON in <tools>) and how calls come back (<tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs). Trained tool calling 20, the template tells the model it may call one or more functions and loops over every entry in an assistant message's tool_calls, and the card reports gains on agentic benchmarks, AA-Briefcase and AutomationBench-AA among them. Structured output 0, the card doesn't document JSON or JSON Schema output. Reasoning control 0, the card documents turning thinking on or off per request with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking, and names the ling3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say where the reasoning text comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens natively in config.json (max_position_embeddings 262144, rope_scaling null) and per SGLang's cookbook. 20 + 10 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 60.
Ripple-65B Preview 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Ricursive's server README says how tools are declared and calls come back, with the ripple parser in SGLang 0.5.19. Trained tool calling 20, one or more calls a turn and agentic-coding RL. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the template has no thinking switch or effort levels. Context 10, long-context training at 2M-token sequences for a stated 1M.
Risk Ripple-65B Preview +10
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the repository's configuration_bailing_moe_v3.py, since vLLM 0.33.0 registers no bailing_hybrid config of its own. Provenance 15, files in the inclusionAI organisation that inclusion-ai.org links to, per the Ling-3.0-tiny listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results for the model on its card or in the training-content summary. Agent guidance 0, the card has nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards, and inclusionAI publishes no guardrail probe for this model as it did for Ling 3.0. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no field-of-use limits, no threshold and no clause letting inclusionAI change or revoke it. Security programme 0, www.inclusion-ai.org answers 404 for security.txt on 10 November 2026, and the Ling-3.0-tiny listing found no SECURITY.md or disclosure policy in the inclusionAI .github repository. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 45.
Ripple-65B Preview 55
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the documented way to run it loads Ricursive's Python. Provenance 15, the files are in the organisation ricursive.com links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Ricursive's own FORTRESS and StrongREJECT results. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw.
Documentation and upkeep Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +7
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56
Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claimed) are on the card. Training data 15, the training-content summary the card links names the source categories (Common Crawl and other public datasets, commercially licensed data, the Ant Spider crawler, synthetic data), the size band (over 10 trillion text tokens), data collected up to about July 2026 and the filtering, without listing datasets with sizes. Last change 20, the newest commit, on 4 November 2026, edited the card, six days before this check, and the files went up on 27 October. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (both opened on 27 October 2026) has a reply from an inclusionAI member. Version policy 5, the update went into a repository of its own and Ling-3.1-flash and Ling 3.0 stay in theirs. File health 5, the card states a 1M-token context while config.json gives 262,144 with no rope scaling, and its serve commands name the earlier repository as the model path. 11 + 15 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 56.
Ripple-65B Preview 49
Model card 14 of 20, no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general description with token counts and no cut-off. Last change 20, released today. Responsiveness 0, no discussions yet, read as none answered. Version policy 5, a first release, with the NVFP4 checkpoint replaced in place on release day under a commit note. File health 5, tokenizer_config.json carries a second, tool-less chat template and a 131,072-token limit against the card's 1M.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Ripple-65B Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 45 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 45 | 55 | Ripple-65B Preview +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 75 | Ripple-65B Preview +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 49 | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.8/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Ripple-65B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Ricursive Intelligence |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
Verdicts
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
inclusionAI's newest flagship, a 560B hybrid mixture of experts under plain MIT that vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run in released versions. It ships only as 574 GB of FP8, so it needs a multi-GPU server. The card overstates the context, documents little about tool calls, and has no safety results.
Ripple-65B Preview
A dense 65B coding model from a new lab, pretrained from scratch and released today under Apache 2.0, that Ricursive says leads U.S. open-weight models on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Nobody has checked that yet, and the custom architecture runs only through Ricursive's own SGLang plugin on Blackwell GPUs, with a 57 GB NVFP4 build as the smallest.
Before you call either
Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Serve it with SGLang 0.5.23 or later on 8 H200 or 4 GB300 GPUs, per the card, and use this repository's name as the model path, not the earlier one the card's command shows
- With vLLM pass
--trust-remote-code,--tool-call-parser ling3and--reasoning-parser ling3 - Set
chat_template_kwargsenable_thinkingfalse for direct answers. Reasoning comes back inreasoning_contentper SGLang's cookbook - Plan on 262,144 tokens of context. The 1M figure needs the YaRN override in SGLang's cookbook
- Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, per the card
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Ripple-65B Preview
- Run Ricursive's launcher from inference/server with
uv run --script serve.pyon two B200 GPUs; it listens on 127.0.0.1:30000 with a 16K context by default - The launcher turns on
--reasoning-parser rippleand--tool-call-parser ripple; without them tool calls come back as raw text inside tool_call tags - For
tool_choice: "required"setstrict: trueandadditionalProperties: falseon each function, which the README says stopped extra argument fields - Leave room in
max_tokensfor reasoning as well as the answer, since thinking is always on - Use chat_template.jinja, not the template inside tokenizer_config.json, which has no tool support
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Ripple-65B Preview?
Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ling-3.1-flash-1019 or Ripple-65B Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Arete-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Arete-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- BigBang-v1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Carbon-X vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Carbon-X vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling-Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Inkling vs Ripple-65B Preview
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kolibri-1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kronos vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kronos vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LBS-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Mistral Large 4
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Recursive Flint
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-ripple-65b-preview.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.json·/api/v1/tools/ripple-65b-preview.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ling-3-1-flash-1019 ripple-65b-preview(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ling-3-1-flash-1019", "b": "ripple-65b-preview"}at/mcp, no key