Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3674 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 45
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Teams with Blackwell GPUs or a DGX Spark who want an Apache 2.0 coding model to try for terminal and agentic coding work, and can run the publisher's code to serve it.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 41
Watch for
No released runtime runs the architecture, so running it means Ricursive's Python in SGLang 0.5.19 or Transformers' remote code
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Laguna S 2.1 +30
Laguna S 2.1 75
Memory 10 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Ollama's 66 GB MLX nvfp4, which needs 96 GB with a fifth added and fits our 128 GB reference machine. Runtimes 25, released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the laguna architecture. Builds 15, Poolside publishes FP8, INT4, NVFP4, MLX and GGUF builds. Terms 10, OpenMDW-1.1 is permissive but not OSI-approved. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 5, Poolside's own API serves it and Featherless AI hosts it, though Poolside's OpenRouter endpoints have expired.
Ripple-65B Preview 45
Memory 10 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Ricursive's NVFP4 at 57.2 GB, 68.7 GB with a fifth added, which is over 64 GB and fits our reference machine. Runtimes 0, no released runtime runs the ricursive architecture with its own code; Ricursive's SGLang plugin and Transformers' remote code don't count. Builds 10, one quantised precision (NVFP4) from Ricursive. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, Ricursive serves no API, Hugging Face maps no provider, Together AI's page says coming soon, and GMI Cloud's and OpenRouter's pages weren't read.
Agent interface Laguna S 2.1 +10
Laguna S 2.1 85
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, the card names the poolside_v1 parser for three runtimes and Poolside's post shows the call format, a judgement call since the worked example sits on the XS 2.1 card. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn. Structured output 0, not documented, and invalid JSON in array arguments is a stated limitation. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking per request with the reasoning in reasoning_content. Context 10, 1M tokens trained per Poolside's build cards.
Ripple-65B Preview 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository. Tool-calling format 25, Ricursive's server README says how tools are declared and calls come back, with the ripple parser in SGLang 0.5.19. Trained tool calling 20, one or more calls a turn and agentic-coding RL. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the template has no thinking switch or effort levels. Context 10, long-context training at 2M-token sequences for a stated 1M.
Documentation and upkeep Ripple-65B Preview +8
Laguna S 2.1 41
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are on the card, limitations, languages and a cut-off aren't. Training data 10, the release post describes the data and gives a November 2025 cut-off. Last change 15, 25 August 2026, 70 days back. Responsiveness 0, Poolside answered none of the 34 discussions. Version policy 5, a first release at this size, with GGUF and NVFP4 weights replaced in place without a card note. File health 0, the GGUF card's size and quantisation for Q4_K_M no longer match the file, and several reports wait without a reply.
Ripple-65B Preview 49
Model card 14 of 20, no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general description with token counts and no cut-off. Last change 20, released today. Responsiveness 0, no discussions yet, read as none answered. Version policy 5, a first release, with the NVFP4 checkpoint replaced in place on release day under a commit note. File health 5, tokenizer_config.json carries a second, tool-less chat template and a 131,072-token limit against the card's 1M.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Ripple-65B Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 45 | Laguna S 2.1 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Laguna S 2.1 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 49 | Ripple-65B Preview +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 53.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Ripple-65B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Ricursive Intelligence |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-21 | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-21 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Ripple-65B Preview
A dense 65B coding model from a new lab, pretrained from scratch and released today under Apache 2.0, that Ricursive says leads U.S. open-weight models on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Nobody has checked that yet, and the custom architecture runs only through Ricursive's own SGLang plugin on Blackwell GPUs, with a 57 GB NVFP4 build as the smallest.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Ripple-65B Preview
- Run Ricursive's launcher from inference/server with
uv run --script serve.pyon two B200 GPUs; it listens on 127.0.0.1:30000 with a 16K context by default - The launcher turns on
--reasoning-parser rippleand--tool-call-parser ripple; without them tool calls come back as raw text inside tool_call tags - For
tool_choice: "required"setstrict: trueandadditionalProperties: falseon each function, which the README says stopped extra argument fields - Leave room in
max_tokensfor reasoning as well as the answer, since thinking is always on - Use chat_template.jinja, not the template inside tokenizer_config.json, which has no tool support
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Ripple-65B Preview?
Laguna S 2.1 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ripple-65B Preview's 53.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ripple-65B Preview leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Ripple-65B Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ripple-65B Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Ripple-65B Preview
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LBS-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Recursive Flint vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-ripple-65b-preview.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/ripple-65b-preview.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 ripple-65b-preview(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "ripple-65b-preview"}at/mcp, no key