Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B B
Best for Agents on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a fast tool-calling reasoning model with long context and a permissive licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Risk, 75 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 70 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
No safety evaluation results published
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 75 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 90 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 70 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 64.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-08-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
A small agent cousin, 3B active parameters, with trained parallel tool calls, a thinking switch and up to 1M tokens of context, under a permissive licence. It runs in about 23 GB from the GGUF or Ollama builds, and NVIDIA's NVFP4 build needs NVIDIA GPUs. The main risks are no published safety results and one answered question across two repositories.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning, about 19 to 25 GB of files depending on the platform - On the reference machine use
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_0 --jinja, since the card's Q4_K_M tag doesn't exist there and NVFP4 needs NVIDIA GPUs - With vLLM serve it with
--reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder(SGLang uses--reasoning-parser nemotron_3) - Use
temperature=1.0andtop_p=0.95, as the card says - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - For coding agents pass
force_nonempty_content: trueinchat_template_kwargs, which vLLM's nemotron_v3 parser reads so a cut-off reasoning trace still returns content - Go past 262,144 tokens only with the card's flags (
VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1,--max-model-len 1048576) and enough memory
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "nemotron-3-5-lightning-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key