Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
Laguna S 2.1 and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniCPM5-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 90 | MiniCPM5-2B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Laguna S 2.1 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 97 | MiniCPM5-2B +56 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 60.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | MiniCPM5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | OpenBMB |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or MiniCPM5-2B?
Laguna S 2.1 and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-minicpm5-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 minicpm5-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "minicpm5-2b"}at/mcp, no key