Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 31
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or a Mac, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 31 | MiniCPM5-2B +66 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
A mid-size coding and terminal-agent cousin with about 3B active parameters, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It runs in about 24 GB from Ornith's MLX 4-bit build or 32 GB from its GGUF. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies to 35 reports.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:35b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144as the card gives it - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for general tasks and temperature 1.0 to reproduce the card's benchmarks
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-35B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B?
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b ornith-1-5-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "ornith-1-5-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key