Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback.
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 31
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
510.3 GB of files and no smaller build anywhere, so it won't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or a Mac, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 90 | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 31 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
A large multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, documented tool calls, JSON Schema output and a reasoning budget, under MIT. It needs about 612 GB of memory across several GPUs in vLLM or SGLang. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's code rather than a template, no published safety results and no answers in its repositories.
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
A mid-size coding and terminal-agent cousin with about 3B active parameters, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It runs in about 24 GB from Ornith's MLX 4-bit build or 32 GB from its GGUF. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies to 35 reports.
Before you call either
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek's reference run is its inference folder, convert.py with --model-parallel 8 --expert-dtype fp4, then torchrun --nproc-per-node 8 generate.py --ckpt-path "$SAVE_PATH" --config config.json --interactive
- In vLLM 0.32.0 the parsers are named deepseek_v41 for both --tool-call-parser and --reasoning-parser. That's vLLM's naming, DeepSeek doesn't document a vLLM command
- Build prompts with encoding.py or pip install deepseek-recipe, not the September repository's chat_template.jinja, which an open pull request says trails the 16 October encoding
- Tool calls come back in a DSML calls block with a space before calls, invoke and parameter, unlike V4
- Set reasoning_effort to 1 to 100, or low, high or max (50, 75, 100), in thinking mode only. Default is 75
- Sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 and allow 256K or more output tokens, as the card recommends
- Without the hardware, call DeepSeek's API as deepseek-flash, which serves this exact update
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:35b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144as the card gives it - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for general tasks and temperature 1.0 to reproduce the card's benchmarks
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-35B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B?
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v4-1-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v4-1-flash ornith-1-5-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v4-1-flash", "b": "ornith-1-5-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key