Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview's 51.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash C

Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback.

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 75 against 45
  • Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 28

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 1.8 out of 5

Watch for

510.3 GB of files and no smaller build anywhere, so it won't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine

InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview D

Best for Agents with 64 GB to spare that want an Apache-licensed image and video reader with optional thinking and can live with a stale preview.

Ahead on

  • Reach, 60 against 50
  • Risk, 55 against 50

Watch for

No quantised build from OpenGVLab, so about 51 GB at BF16

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-PreviewEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%255060InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview +10
Risk20%205055InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview +5
Agent interface10%107545DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +30
Documentation and upkeep10%104828DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +20
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 59/100D 51.2/100

Facts side by side

FactDeepSeek V4.1 FlashInternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorDeepSeekOpenGVLab (Shanghai AI Laboratory)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITApache-2.0; a merge of openai/gpt-oss-20b (Apache 2.0 with OpenAI's usage policy) and OpenGVLab/InternViT-300M-448px-V2_5 (MIT)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-172025-09-08
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)1.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

A large multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, documented tool calls, JSON Schema output and a reasoning budget, under MIT. It needs about 612 GB of memory across several GPUs in vLLM or SGLang. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's code rather than a template, no published safety results and no answers in its repositories.

InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview

An image and video reader on gpt-oss-20b with an optional thinking mode, a preview untouched for over a year. It needs about 51 GB in BF16, since OpenGVLab publishes no quantised build, and runs in Transformers and vLLM. The main risk is a chat template in the Transformers-format repository that doesn't match its tokenizer, with no safety results.

Before you call either

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  1. DeepSeek's reference run is its inference folder, convert.py with --model-parallel 8 --expert-dtype fp4, then torchrun --nproc-per-node 8 generate.py --ckpt-path "$SAVE_PATH" --config config.json --interactive
  2. In vLLM 0.32.0 the parsers are named deepseek_v41 for both --tool-call-parser and --reasoning-parser. That's vLLM's naming, DeepSeek doesn't document a vLLM command
  3. Build prompts with encoding.py or pip install deepseek-recipe, not the September repository's chat_template.jinja, which an open pull request says trails the 16 October encoding
  4. Tool calls come back in a DSML calls block with a space before calls, invoke and parameter, unlike V4
  5. Set reasoning_effort to 1 to 100, or low, high or max (50, 75, 100), in thinking mode only. Default is 75
  6. Sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 and allow 256K or more output tokens, as the card recommends
  7. Without the hardware, call DeepSeek's API as deepseek-flash, which serves this exact update

InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview

  1. Serve with vllm serve OpenGVLab/InternVL3_5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview-HF --max-model-len 32768, which is our command; the card gives none for vLLM
  2. Check the rendered prompt before relying on it, since the shipped template's <|im_start|> markers aren't tokens in the gpt-oss tokenizer; the GitHub-format repository's harmony template is the alternative
  3. Use Transformers 4.55.0 or later, as the card requires for this size
  4. For thinking, send the card's thinking system prompt and parse the reasoning out of the <think> tags, with temperature 0.6 and sampling on as the card advises
  5. Keep inputs within 32K tokens, the length it was trained at, whatever the config says

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview's 51.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview leads on reach and risk.

Other comparisons with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.