Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B's 52.1 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback.
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 41
Watch for
510.3 GB of files and no smaller build anywhere, so it won't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
Best for Agent builders who want to train or test an agent against simulated tools, terminals, browsers and phones on a 128 GB machine
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
Not a general assistant, and the card doesn't describe using it to call tools
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent interface DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +25
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 75
There's no Jinja template in the 17 October repository, only code to run, so the template line gets 10. DeepSeek documents the DSML tool format both ways and ships its own parser in encoding.py and deepseek-recipe, but names no parser in a runtime (10, read as for DeepSeek-V3.2 and V4-Flash-0731), and one block can carry several calls (20). deepseek-recipe documents JSON Schema output via response_format (15). Thinking turns off in chat mode and takes an effort budget from 1 to 100, with reasoning returned in think tags (10). The 1M context was trained in (10).
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 50
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, the same as the template in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 10, only the template says how tools are declared and how calls come back. Trained tool calling 10, the template renders several tool_call blocks in one turn, but the card presents the model as a simulator of what tools and environments return, not as a tool caller. Structured output 0, no JSON or JSON Schema output documented for the model. Reasoning control 0, the card says thinking is on by default and names the qwen3 reasoning parser, but doesn't say how to turn thinking off or budget it. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native per the card and the text config. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 50.
Documentation and upkeep DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 48
The cards cover architecture, parameters and context but not intended use, limitations, languages or a cut-off, so 8. Training data is a general description with no cut-off, which caps it at 5. The files changed on 16 and 17 October and DeepSeek's deepseek-recipe 0.2.0 changed the V4.1 prompt encoding on 20 October, inside 30 days (20). None of the 40 most recent questions across both repositories had a DeepSeek reply (0). Every release keeps its own repository and the update names what it replaces (10). File health loses 5 for an open, unanswered pull request saying the September template trails the encoding changes. 8 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 5 = 48.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 41
Model card 11, the card gives intended use (simulating agent environments), architecture, parameters and context length. Training data 5, A general description without a cut-off, the three training stages and a statement that no outputs from external API services were included. Last change 10, the last commit was on 25 June 2026, an update to the card, 138 days before this check, past 90 days and within 180. Responsiveness 0, 10 discussions that aren't pull requests, opened between 24 June and 5 July 2026. Version policy 5, A first release, with nothing replaced. File health 10, Config, both copies of the template and the card agree on the architecture and the context. 11 + 5 + 10 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 41.
Reach DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 60
Memory scores nothing, because the only build is DeepSeek's own at 510.3 GB, about 612 GB with the fifth added, and nobody's runtime library holds a smaller one at 4-bit or better. Four runtimes run it in a released version (5 each), vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, which maps the V4.1 architecture name onto its V4 model, llama.cpp from b11870 (25 October 2026), which added the deepseek41 architecture and its converter, and Ollama 0.40.14, which builds llama.cpp b11963. Transformers 5.22.1 and LM Studio don't (0 each). The release itself is one quantised build, FP8 with FP4 experts (10). MIT with nothing added earns the full terms line (15), the repositories aren't gated (10), and Hugging Face maps three live inference providers for the update (5). 0 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 60.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 55
Memory 10, Alibaba's only build is the BF16 safetensors, 69.32 GB, and 69.32 GB × 1.2 = 83.2 GB, above 64 GB and inside the reference machine's GPU share. Runtimes 20, Four released runtimes run the architecture, vLLM 0.33.0 (Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration), SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 (qwen3_5_moe) and llama.cpp b12242 (its Qwen conversion code). Builds 0, Alibaba publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 15, Apache 2.0, an OSI licence, in the metadata and as a LICENSE file, with no use policy or other terms added. Download 10, the repository isn't gated, so the files download with no account and no terms to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026). 10 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 55.
Risk Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B +5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 50
The weights are safetensors only, but 10 comes off because the card's way to build prompts is running encoding.py from the repository, since there's no Jinja template. The files sit in DeepSeek's own organisation with a hash for every file. Nothing is published on safety and there's no guidance for agent use, so those two lines score 0. The security programme earns 5 for the security@deepseek.com reporting address in DeepSeek's site footer, read as for DeepSeek-V3.2, with no security.txt and no public advisories. The MIT licence carries no use policy, threshold or revocation, so licence risk keeps all 15.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 55
File safety 25, 21 safetensors shards and no pickle or Python files, and config.json has no auto_map. Provenance 15, files sit in the Qwen organisation, the one Alibaba's Qwen repositories on GitHub link to per the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B listing (10), and the Hub gives a SHA-256 for every large file (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, no prompt-injection guidance, instruction hierarchy, refusal statement or general cautions on the card. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, no threshold and no terms the licensor can change or revoke, and the card's licence link points at the LICENSE file in the repository. Security programme 0, no reporting route on the card. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 60 | 55 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 50 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 41 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.5/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
A large multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, documented tool calls, JSON Schema output and a reasoning budget, under MIT. It needs about 612 GB of memory across several GPUs and runs in vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's code instead of a template, no published safety results and no DeepSeek replies.
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
A specialist, not a chat model. It plays the environment an agent acts in, across seven domains, so you can train or test an agent without the real thing. Alibaba ships BF16 only, which fits a 128 GB machine, and hasn't answered a discussion on it or changed the files since June.
Before you call either
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek's reference run is its inference folder, convert.py with --model-parallel 8 --expert-dtype fp4, then torchrun --nproc-per-node 8 generate.py --ckpt-path "$SAVE_PATH" --config config.json --interactive
- In vLLM 0.32.0 the parsers are named deepseek_v41 for both --tool-call-parser and --reasoning-parser. That's vLLM's naming, DeepSeek doesn't document a vLLM command
- In llama.cpp, convert with convert_hf_to_gguf.py from b11870 or later, which added the deepseek41 architecture on 25 October 2026; no GGUF is published by DeepSeek
- Build prompts with encoding.py or pip install deepseek-recipe, not the September repository's chat_template.jinja, which an open pull request says trails the 16 October encoding
- Tool calls come back in a DSML calls block with a space before calls, invoke and parameter, unlike V4
- Set reasoning_effort to 1 to 100, or low, high or max (50, 75, 100), in thinking mode only. Default is 75
- Sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 and allow 256K or more output tokens, as the card recommends
- Without the hardware, call DeepSeek's API as deepseek-flash, which serves this exact update
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Use it as the environment, not the agent. Give it the domain's system prompt from Alibaba's GitHub repository, the history and the agent's action, and it returns the predicted observation
- With vLLM pass
--language-model-only, or startup fails on the missing vision weights - Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20, and allow up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends
- Keep at least 128K of context, since the simulation depends on the history
- Thinking is on by default and comes back through the qwen3 reasoning parser
- A simulated observation is a prediction. Check anything that matters against the real environment
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores 61.5 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B's 52.1 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Arete-27B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Carbon-X vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kronos
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recursive Flint
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ripple-65B Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v4-1-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v4-1-flash qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v4-1-flash", "b": "qwen-agentworld-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key