Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback.
Ahead on
- Capability, 69 against 62
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 39
Watch for
510.3 GB of files and no smaller build anywhere, so it won't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
Best for Agents with a 128 GB unified-memory machine or two large GPUs that want a capable vision-language model with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 50
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
Too big for a single 64 GB machine even at 4 bits
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 69 | 62 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +7 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 80 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 48 | 39 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | B 63.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-02-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
A large multimodal agent model with a 1M-token context, documented tool calls, JSON Schema output and a reasoning budget, under MIT. It needs about 612 GB of memory across several GPUs in vLLM or SGLang. The main risks are prompts built from DeepSeek's code rather than a template, no published safety results and no answers in its repositories.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
A strong mid-size cousin for coding, agent steps and reading images or video, with thinking you can switch off per request. Alibaba's 4-bit build needs about 95 GB, which fits one 128 GB unified-memory machine, and several providers host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, agent guidance or answers from Alibaba.
Before you call either
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek's reference run is its inference folder, convert.py with --model-parallel 8 --expert-dtype fp4, then torchrun --nproc-per-node 8 generate.py --ckpt-path "$SAVE_PATH" --config config.json --interactive
- In vLLM 0.32.0 the parsers are named deepseek_v41 for both --tool-call-parser and --reasoning-parser. That's vLLM's naming, DeepSeek doesn't document a vLLM command
- Build prompts with encoding.py or pip install deepseek-recipe, not the September repository's chat_template.jinja, which an open pull request says trails the 16 October encoding
- Tool calls come back in a DSML calls block with a space before calls, invoke and parameter, unlike V4
- Set reasoning_effort to 1 to 100, or low, high or max (50, 75, 100), in thinking mode only. Default is 75
- Sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 and allow 256K or more output tokens, as the card recommends
- Without the hardware, call DeepSeek's API as deepseek-flash, which serves this exact update
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Quickest start on a 128 GB machine is
ollama run qwen3.5:122b(Q4_K_M, 81 GB of files, about 97 GB with context) - Alibaba's 4-bit build serves with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-122B-A10B-GPTQ-Int4 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --quantization moe_wna16, though that kernel isn't documented for AMD gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser, as the card's commands do
- Turn thinking off with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false}in the request body, since it's on by default and/thinkand/nothinkaren't supported - Sampling per the card is temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
- Add
--language-model-onlyin vLLM to skip the vision encoder and free memory for the KV cache when you only need text - Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Agents-A1-4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- BigBang-v1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.5-Air
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-120b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs gpt-oss-20b
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Granite 4.2 3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kolibri-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs occamy-1.0
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-v4-1-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-122b-a10b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-v4-1-flash qwen3-5-122b-a10b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-v4-1-flash", "b": "qwen3-5-122b-a10b"}at/mcp, no key