Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Laguna S 2.1 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Agents with a 128 GB unified-memory machine or two large GPUs that want a capable vision-language model with a plain licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 80 against 75
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
Too big for a single 64 GB machine even at 4 bits
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 80 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Laguna S 2.1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 39 | Laguna S 2.1 +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 63.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-02-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
A strong mid-size cousin for coding, agent steps and reading images or video, with thinking you can switch off per request. Alibaba's 4-bit build needs about 95 GB, which fits one 128 GB unified-memory machine, and several providers host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, agent guidance or answers from Alibaba.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Quickest start on a 128 GB machine is
ollama run qwen3.5:122b(Q4_K_M, 81 GB of files, about 97 GB with context) - Alibaba's 4-bit build serves with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-122B-A10B-GPTQ-Int4 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --quantization moe_wna16, though that kernel isn't documented for AMD gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser, as the card's commands do
- Turn thinking off with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false}in the request body, since it's on by default and/thinkand/nothinkaren't supported - Sampling per the card is temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, top_k 20 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- Keep the context at 128K or more if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only past 262,144 tokens
- Add
--language-model-onlyin vLLM to skip the vision encoder and free memory for the KV cache when you only need text - Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Laguna S 2.1 leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-122b-a10b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 qwen3-5-122b-a10b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "qwen3-5-122b-a10b"}at/mcp, no key