Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
Laguna S 2.1 and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3341 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 55
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory, or the 128 GB reference machine, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops and can wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 41
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; every agentic number on the card is Nanbeige's own run
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 55 | Laguna S 2.1 +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 56 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Nanbeige4.3-33B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. It needs about 96 GB at BF16, as Nanbeige ships no quantised build. Its agentic results so far are Nanbeige's own, with no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
Laguna S 2.1 and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs Laguna S 2.1
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-nanbeige-4-3-33b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 nanbeige-4-3-33b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "nanbeige-4-3-33b"}at/mcp, no key