Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
Laguna S 2.1 and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 80
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 75
- Risk, 65 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
65,536 tokens trained; 131,072 needs a YaRN edit to config.json
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | SmolLM3-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 85 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 65 | SmolLM3-3B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 80 | Laguna S 2.1 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 54 | SmolLM3-3B +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | SmolLM3-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Hugging Face |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2025-09-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
SmolLM3-3B
A tiny, fully open cousin with documented tool calling and switchable thinking, for local subtasks and routing on laptops and CPUs. It needs about 8 GB in BF16, or under 3 GB in Hugging Face's 4-bit ONNX build for ONNX Runtime. The main risks are a 64K native context, no safety results and no repository changes since September 2025.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
SmolLM3-3B
- Start it with
vllm serve HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser=hermes, or tool calls come back as text - Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since thinking is on by default; a/thinkor/no_thinkflag in the system prompt overrides the kwarg - Put earlier tool calls in the assistant message content, since the template ignores a
tool_callsfield when it renders history - Add the YaRN
rope_scalingblock (factor 2.0, original 65536) to config.json before sending more than 65,536 tokens - Use temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95, the card's recommended sampling
- Needs Transformers v4.53.0 or later; for llama.cpp use a GGUF from ggml-org or another converter, since Hugging Face publishes none
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or SmolLM3-3B?
Laguna S 2.1 and SmolLM3-3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). SmolLM3-3B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or SmolLM3-3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SmolLM3-3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SmolLM3-3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs SmolLM3-3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs SmolLM3-3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SmolLM3-3B
- occamy-1.0 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-smollm3-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/smollm3-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 smollm3-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "smollm3-3b"}at/mcp, no key