Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing long coding sessions on a 128 GB machine or a multi-GPU server that want a permissive licence and a 1M context.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any of 34 discussions, many of them reports about thinking and tool calls
Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 75
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
- Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 41
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna S 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 75 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 41 | 75 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 67.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna S 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-08-24 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna S 2.1
A strong coding and agent cousin for long sessions, with 8B active parameters and a 1M-token context. At 4-bit it needs a 96 to 128 GB machine, tight on a 128 GB one. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its many reports, there are no safety results, and a build card misdescribes its file.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.
Before you call either
Laguna S 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-s-2.1, 96 GB for the default Q4_K_M, or the 66 GB nvfp4 tag on Apple Silicon - On our reference machine try
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 65536, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it). The 96 GB file leaves little room for context in 107.4 GB - With vLLM or SGLang use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1, and with TensorRT-LLM--tool_parser poolside_v1 --reasoning_parser laguna - Thinking is on by default in the template, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, and keepreasoning_contentfrom earlier turns - The GGUFs ship set to 262,144 tokens. For 1M with llama.cpp add
--ctx-size 1048576 --rope-scaling yarn --rope-scale 128 --yarn-orig-ctx 8192, which Poolside says can cost quality - Sampling per the generation config is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20, and Poolside suggests temperature 0.7 and top_p 0.95 at 1M
- Expect occasional tool-schema slips in harnesses unlike Poolside's own, and validate JSON arguments, which Poolside lists as known limitations
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b(18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere) - On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after
wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, thenvllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
- Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
- Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
- In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
- Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna S 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna S 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna S 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna S 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna S 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-s-2-1-vs-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-s-2-1.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-s-2-1 nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-s-2-1", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key