Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against LFM3-1.7B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM3-1.7B leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop, phone or small server that need tool calling and a long context from a model under 2 GB at 4 bits
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 100 against 90
Watch for
vLLM and SGLang have no released support, though the card lists both
Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 60 against 40
- Documentation and upkeep, 80 against 67
Watch for
The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +20
LFM3-1.7B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 60
File safety earns 15, safetensors only but with the documented serving path passing trust-remote-code and loading a reasoning parser file from the repository. Provenance earns 15, NVIDIA's own organisation with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation earns 0, as the subcards say evaluations ran but publish no results. Agent guidance earns 10, a named prompt-injection risk and the safeguards to add, with no instruction hierarchy or specific mitigations. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 because the licence was replaced on 23 December 2025, eight days after release, with no dated note on the card. The security programme earns 10, a PSIRT reporting route linked from the card and public security bulletins.
Documentation and upkeep Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +13
LFM3-1.7B 67
Model card 17, Intended use (local agents, tool calling, structured outputs, fine-tuning), a limitation (not recommended for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning), architecture (24 layers: 13 gated short convolutions, 5 sliding-window and 6 global attention), parameters (1.73B), context (256K) and 16 languages. Training data 5, A general description: 22T tokens of pre-training in two stages with the kinds of data added since LFM2, 1.75T tokens of supervised fine-tuning, then mixed reinforcement learning, distillation from six specialist teachers and agentic reinforcement learning. Last change 20, the last commit, on 9 November 2026, added the OpenVINO checkpoint to the card's inference table, a day before this check. Responsiveness 10, Of the 22 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 October to 8 November 2026), 7 have a reply from a LiquidAI member, which is some. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the lfm3 architecture, the 262,144-token context and the thinking switch. 17 + 5 + 20 + 10 + 5 + 10 = 67.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 80
The model card earns 20, with all seven items on the card and its subcards. Training data earns 20, datasets listed with sources and token counts, both cut-offs, the filtering, and much of the data released, though some synthetic sets don't give a size. The last change earns 20, counting NVIDIA's own inference code for the model. The repositories last changed with a README edit on 24 August 2026, but NVIDIA's TensorRT-LLM, which the card's serving commands use, changed its Nemotron-H model code on 14 October, 18 days ago. Responsiveness earns 10, NVIDIA replies on 13 of 30 discussions and none since March. Version policy earns 5 for a first release with no dated notes. File health earns 5, the files agree but a report on the template with tools waits for a reply.
Agent interface LFM3-1.7B +10
LFM3-1.7B 100
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,129 characters), with roles, tools, deferred tools, tool results and the thinking switch. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card says the model was trained on tool calls and agentic traces and with reinforcement learning inside agent harnesses. Structured output 15, Liquid's API guide documents response_format with a JSON Schema, with lfm3-1.7b as the model in its examples, and says the schema is checked before generation starts. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking=False in the chat template to turn reasoning off per request, with reasoning on by default inside think tags, and preserve_thinking for earlier turns. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, which says the mid-training stage extended the context window to 256K, and max_position_embeddings 262144 in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 10 = 100.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 90
The chat template earns 20 as a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, since the card names the qwen3_coder parser and NVIDIA's own vLLM cookbook shows tools declared in the OpenAI schema and calls coming back as tool_calls. Trained tool calling earns 20, multi-step tool use in training and several calls to a turn in the template. Structured output earns 5, a claim of structured output training with no way to ask for JSON. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request, a reasoning budget, and reasoning returned by the nano_v3 parser. Context earns 10 for 1M tokens with no scaling.
Reach Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5
LFM3-1.7B 85
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB, and 1.10 GB × 1.2 = 1.3 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 15, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture (src/models/lfm3.cpp at b12242), Ollama's library has an lfm3 entry, and LM Studio's catalogue runs the architecture (its liquid/lfm3-vl-2b entry; lmstudio-community publishes a GGUF of this model). Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-1.7b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 90
Memory earns 25 because the smallest 4-bit build is Ollama's NVFP4 MLX build at 18 GB, 21.6 GB with the fifth added, and NVIDIA's own NVFP4 build lands in the same 24 GB band. Runtimes earn the full 25, with released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang, LM Studio and Transformers all running it. Builds earn 15 for NVIDIA's own FP8 and NVFP4 builds. Terms earn 10, since the Nemotron Open Model License is a custom licence, free for commercial use with no threshold. Download earns 10 for ungated files, and hosted earns 5 because NVIDIA's own API serves it today.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-1.7B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 60 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 100 | 90 | LFM3-1.7B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 67 | 80 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 67.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-1.7B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-08-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2025-12-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-1.7B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM3-1.7B
A 1.73B model that fits an 8 GB machine with room to spare, with a documented tool-call format, deferred tools, a thinking switch and a 256K context. It runs today in llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio only, loads in Transformers through repository code, and has no safety results, security contact or data sources.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.
Before you call either
LFM3-1.7B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3 - Use temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition penalty 1.1 for chat, tools and agents, per the card
- Pass
enable_thinking=Falsefor direct answers, and expect it to reason anyway on hard tasks - For a large tool catalogue mark tools
defer_loadingand give it a search tool - Don't plan on vLLM or SGLang until a release carries LFM3
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b(18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere) - On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after
wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, thenvllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
- Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
- Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
- In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
- Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-1.7B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against LFM3-1.7B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LFM3-1.7B leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with LFM3-1.7B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-1.7B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Arete-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-1.7B
- Carbon-X vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cola2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Cola2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-1.7B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-1.7B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-1.7B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-1.7B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-1.7B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-1.7B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs LFM3-1.7B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-1.7B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kronos vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kronos vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-1.7B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-1.7B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-1.7B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-1.7B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-1.7B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-1.7B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs ZAYA1-8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-1-7b-vs-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-1-7b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-1-7b nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-1-7b", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key