Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Apertus v1.5 8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Apertus v1.5 8B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fully open, multilingual 8B with image and audio input on one 24 GB GPU, and can run a publisher fork of vLLM.
Ahead on
- Risk, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 84 against 75
Watch for
No released runtime supports it, only Swiss AI's forks of vLLM and Transformers
Best for Agents with a 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac that want a quick tool-calling and reasoning cousin with very long context.
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 40
- Agent interface, 90 against 85
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
The documented vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM commands pass trust-remote-code and load a parser file from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apertus v1.5 8B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 60 | Apertus v1.5 8B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 84 | 75 | Apertus v1.5 8B +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | B 67.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apertus v1.5 8B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Swiss AI Initiative (EPFL and ETH Zurich) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with the Apertus Acceptable Use Policy (v1.5, 14 July 2026) accepted at the download gate | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License (custom, Apache-style, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-08-24 |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Apertus v1.5 8B
A fully open 8B cousin, training data included, for multilingual chat and tool calls with images and audio in. It needs about 22 GB in BF16 and Swiss AI's own vLLM or Transformers fork, since no released runtime supports it. The main risks are a gated download with a policy to pass on and tools that fail with thinking on.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
A fast hybrid Mamba-Transformer cousin with 3.5B active parameters for reasoning and tool calling over very long inputs, in every major local runtime. A 4-bit build needs about 22 to 23 GB. The main risks are that NVIDIA's documented vLLM path runs repository code, no safety results are published and NVIDIA hasn't answered reports since March.
Before you call either
Apertus v1.5 8B
- Accept the terms on the card and set HF_TOKEN before downloading
- Use Swiss AI's Docker image ghcr.io/swiss-ai/vllm_apertus_1.5_release, since stock vLLM and Transformers don't load Apertus1p5ForConditionalGeneration yet
- Serve with
--chat-template-content-format string --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser apertusfor tools, and leave thinking off when you need tools - For thinking, set
--reasoning-parser apertusand--default-chat-template-kwargs.enable_thinking true, and budget max tokens generously - Audio is resampled to 24 kHz and costs 40 tokens a second, and video must be passed as frames
- Don't cast the loaded model with .half(), the image and audio tokenizers must stay in F32
- If you redistribute the weights, the policy says you must pass it on and get the recipient's express assent
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Start it with
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b(18 GB MLX on a Mac, 24 GB q4_K_M elsewhere) - On the reference machine use BF16 with vLLM, after
wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16/resolve/main/nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py, thenvllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 --max-model-len 262144 --trust-remote-code --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - NVFP4 needs an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, and FP8 isn't documented on gfx1151
- Without the qwen3_coder tool parser and the nano_v3 reasoning parser, tool calls and reasoning come back as plain text
- Card sampling is temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 for tool calling, temperature 1.0 and top_p 1.0 for reasoning
- Thinking is on by default, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks
- Set VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 and raise --max-model-len only when you need more than 262,144 tokens
- In SGLang the main branch names the reasoning parser nemotron_3, not the card's nano_v3
- Filter untrusted tool results before they reach the model, as NVIDIA warns prompt injection can lead to code execution
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since none is documented for the model
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Apertus v1.5 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Apertus v1.5 8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Apertus v1.5 8B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Apertus v1.5 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apertus v1.5 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs BigBang-v1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/apertus-v1-5-8b-vs-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/apertus-v1-5-8b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare apertus-v1-5-8b nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "apertus-v1-5-8b", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key