Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Apertus v1.5 8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Apertus v1.5 8B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want a fully open, multilingual 8B with image and audio input on one 24 GB GPU, and can run a publisher fork of vLLM.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 84 against 65
Watch for
No released runtime supports it, only Swiss AI's forks of vLLM and Transformers
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 40
- Risk, 80 against 75
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Apertus v1.5 8B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 90 | Muse Glimmer 30B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 75 | 80 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Apertus v1.5 8B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 84 | 65 | Apertus v1.5 8B +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | BB 70/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Apertus v1.5 8B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Swiss AI Initiative (EPFL and ETH Zurich) | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0, with the Apertus Acceptable Use Policy (v1.5, 14 July 2026) accepted at the download gate | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Apertus v1.5 8B
A fully open 8B cousin, training data included, for multilingual chat and tool calls with images and audio in. It needs about 22 GB in BF16 and Swiss AI's own vLLM or Transformers fork, since no released runtime supports it. The main risks are a gated download with a policy to pass on and tools that fail with thinking on.
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Apertus v1.5 8B
- Accept the terms on the card and set HF_TOKEN before downloading
- Use Swiss AI's Docker image ghcr.io/swiss-ai/vllm_apertus_1.5_release, since stock vLLM and Transformers don't load Apertus1p5ForConditionalGeneration yet
- Serve with
--chat-template-content-format string --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser apertusfor tools, and leave thinking off when you need tools - For thinking, set
--reasoning-parser apertusand--default-chat-template-kwargs.enable_thinking true, and budget max tokens generously - Audio is resampled to 24 kHz and costs 40 tokens a second, and video must be passed as frames
- Don't cast the loaded model with .half(), the image and audio tokenizers must stay in F32
- If you redistribute the weights, the policy says you must pass it on and get the recipient's express assent
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Apertus v1.5 8B or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Apertus v1.5 8B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Apertus v1.5 8B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Apertus v1.5 8B or Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Apertus v1.5 8B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Apodex-1.1-mini
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs BigBang-v1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Cosmos-Reason2-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Darwin-36B-Opus
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V3.2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-120b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs gpt-oss-20b
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kolibri-1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna S 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs occamy-1.0
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/apertus-v1-5-8b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/apertus-v1-5-8b.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare apertus-v1-5-8b muse-glimmer-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "apertus-v1-5-8b", "b": "muse-glimmer-30b"}at/mcp, no key