Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 61.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on capability. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 65
- Risk, 80 against 45
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 36
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server or a 128 GB Mac who want Qwen's newest sparse architecture for agentic coding and multimodal work, and aren't a hosted-model or coding-assistant business.
Ahead on
- Capability, 74 against 50
Watch for
No build fits the reference machine's 107.4 GB, and Ollama's smallest Linux build is 120 GB
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 50 | 74 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +24 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 65 | Muse Glimmer 30B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 45 | Muse Glimmer 30B +35 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 36 | Muse Glimmer 30B +29 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70/100 | C 61.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Qwen Community License 1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence). Free of charge, the model name shown in products above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue, and a separate licence from Qwen before commercial use by a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A large sparse cousin with 6B active parameters for agentic coding and multimodal work, previewing Qwen's next architecture. It needs a 128 GB Mac for Ollama's MLX build or about 144 GB for the 4-bit GGUF, and Qwen Cloud serves it. The main risk is a licence that needs a separate deal for hosted-model and coding or office assistant businesses.
Before you call either
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a 128 GB Mac start it with
ollama run qwen3.8-flash-next:125b-mlx(105 GB, NVFP4), on Linux the smallest Ollama build isqwen3.8-flash-next:125b-a6b-q4_K_Mat 120 GB, which won't fit a 107.4 GB GPU share - On a server,
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Use the qwen3_coder tool parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser, as Qwen's GitHub README does
- Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to skip it, and read the reasoning fromreasoning_content, even though SGLang's cookbook says thinking can't be turned off reasoning_efforttakes xhigh (default), medium or low, and any other value makes the template raise an error- Send at most one system message and put it first, since the template raises an error otherwise
- Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 when thinking, temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8 and presence_penalty 1.5 without
- vLLM keeps the 51B n-gram table in host memory on 80 GB GPUs by default, per its recipe
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Qwen Community License before serving it to others as an API or inside a coding or office assistant product
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 61.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on capability.
Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-glimmer-30b qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-glimmer-30b", "b": "qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key