Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Inkling's 64.2 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Inkling leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Inkling B
Best for Agents calling a hosted open multimodal model with audio input, or teams with a multi-GPU datacentre node who want to run it themselves.
Ahead on
- Capability, 60 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 65
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 710 GB, beyond any single workstation
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 50
- Risk, 80 against 70
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling | Muse Glimmer 30B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 60 | 50 | Inkling +10 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 90 | Muse Glimmer 30B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 80 | Muse Glimmer 30B +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Inkling +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 65 | Inkling +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.2/100 | BB 70/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling
Thinking Machines' large multimodal generalist, stronger than Inkling-Small on factual recall by its own numbers. It needs about 710 GB of datacentre GPU memory even in NVFP4, so most agents will use a host such as Together AI or Tinker. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Before you call either
Inkling
- Unless you have a multi-GPU Blackwell or H200 node, call it through Together AI, Fireworks, DeepInfra or Tinker rather than starting it
- On 8 B200 GPUs, SGLang's recipe is
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-NVFP4 --tp 8 --quantization modelopt_fp4 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling - Use the inkling tool parser, not Hermes, and the inkling reasoning parser
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs list xhigh - Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Audio should be 16 kHz WAV, ideally under 20 minutes, and images 40 to 4096 px a side, per the card
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Inkling's 64.2 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Inkling leads on capability, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Inkling or Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Inkling
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling vs Kimi K3
- Inkling vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling muse-glimmer-30b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling", "b": "muse-glimmer-30b"}at/mcp, no key