Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Spark-X2.6-4B's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 80 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 41
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Glimmer 30B | Spark-X2.6-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 50 | Muse Glimmer 30B +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 41 | Muse Glimmer 30B +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Glimmer 30B | Spark-X2.6-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meta | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin, two-day-old card.
Before you call either
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or Spark-X2.6-4B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Spark-X2.6-4B's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-glimmer-30b spark-x2-6-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-glimmer-30b", "b": "spark-x2-6-4b"}at/mcp, no key