Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 70
Watch for
The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 41 against 36
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna M.1 | Spark-X2.6-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 85 | Spark-X2.6-4B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna M.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 70 | Laguna M.1 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 41 | Spark-X2.6-4B +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna M.1 | Spark-X2.6-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Laguna M.1
A large coding and agent cousin under plain Apache 2.0, for agents with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine, and no local runtime library packages it. The main risks are no upkeep since July, no hosted fallback shown today, no safety results, and repository code on the SGLang route.
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin, two-day-old card.
Before you call either
Laguna M.1
- Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with
vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
- It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna M.1 or Spark-X2.6-4B?
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Laguna M.1 or Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna M.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-m-1.json·/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-m-1 spark-x2-6-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-m-1", "b": "spark-x2-6-4b"}at/mcp, no key