Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 56.7 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
The smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 128 GB unified-memory machine or a 96 GB GPU setup, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 70
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Ornith-1.5-122B +5
Laguna M.1 70
Memory 5 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Poolside's 139.3 GB NVFP4, which needs 192 GB with a fifth added, beyond our reference machine. Runtimes 25, released llama.cpp, Ollama (through the llama.cpp release it pins), vLLM, SGLang and Transformers run the laguna architecture. Builds 15, FP8 and NVFP4 from Poolside. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing binding added. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no provider is mapped on the Hub and Poolside's API docs name only S 2.1.
Ornith-1.5-122B 75
Memory 10, since Ornith's own MLX 4-bit build is 69.7 GB and needs about 83.6 GB with the fifth added, over 64 GB and inside the reference machine's 107.4 GB, as do its Q4_K_M GGUF, its NVFP4 build and Ollama's build. Runtimes 25, the most the line gives, from vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2, llama.cpp's qwen35moe architecture, Ollama's library and LM Studio's catalogue for the qwen35moe architecture. Builds 15, Ornith publishes FP8, NVFP4, GGUF and MLX at several precisions. Terms 15, MIT as named in the card's metadata, with nothing added, read by its terms though the repository has no licence file. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, Ornith runs no API and no inference provider serves it. 10 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 75.
Risk Laguna M.1 +5
Laguna M.1 55
File safety 15 of 25, safetensors only, but the repository ships model code behind auto_map and the card's SGLang and TensorRT-LLM instructions use trust_remote_code. Provenance 15, the verified poolside organisation, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 5, general cautions only. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0. Security programme 5, a signed security.txt and a security contact on the card, with no public advisories found.
Ornith-1.5-122B 50
File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only and no Python in any of Ornith's repositories for this size, so the card's --trust-remote-code flag loads nothing from the repository. Provenance 15, the files come from the ornith-ai organisation Ornith's blog links to, with a SHA-256 for every weight file. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, nothing published on either. Licence risk 10, MIT carries no policy, threshold or changeable terms, but the card's licence link is broken. Security programme 0, no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Laguna M.1 | Ornith-1.5-122B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 75 | Ornith-1.5-122B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | Laguna M.1 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 36 | 36 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.7/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Laguna M.1 | Ornith-1.5-122B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Poolside | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-10-24 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-21 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-21 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Ornith-1.5-122B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Laguna M.1
A large open-weight coding and agent model under plain Apache 2.0, for teams with a multi-GPU server. Its smallest build needs about 167 GB, more than a 128 GB machine. Released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers code runs the architecture. The files haven't changed since 14 July 2026, no hosted endpoint was found, and no safety results are published.
Ornith-1.5-122B
The largest Ornith that fits a 128 GB machine, a coding and terminal-agent cousin on Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's architecture with XML tool calls and 262,144 tokens of context. Its 4-bit builds need 84 to 93 GB. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies, and a card that misstates the hardware.
Before you call either
Laguna M.1
- Run the NVFP4 build on Blackwell GPUs with
vllm serve poolside/Laguna-M.1-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on vLLM 0.21.0 or later - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The FP8 build's Docker image and serve.sh predate upstream support and set a 4,096-token context, so prefer a released vLLM
- It doesn't fit our 128 GB reference machine at any published precision
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Ornith-1.5-122B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:122b-q4_K_M, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-122B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 262144 - Budget about 92 GB for the Q4_K_M GGUF with a working context, and less context if the machine has under 100 GB for the model
- In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 for general tasks, as the card recommends
- Add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-122B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp, and validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Laguna M.1 or Ornith-1.5-122B?
Ornith-1.5-122B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 56.7 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on risk.
Other comparisons with Laguna M.1 or Ornith-1.5-122B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna M.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna M.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Arete-27B vs Laguna M.1
- Arete-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna M.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Carbon-X vs Laguna M.1
- Carbon-X vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cola2 vs Laguna M.1
- Cola2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna M.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna M.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna M.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Laguna M.1
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Laguna M.1
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna M.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna M.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna M.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Laguna M.1
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Laguna M.1
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Inkling vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna M.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna M.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kronos vs Laguna M.1
- Kronos vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Mistral Large 4
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna M.1 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna M.1 vs Recursive Flint
- Laguna M.1 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Laguna M.1 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Recursive Flint
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-ornith-1-5-122b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/laguna-m-1.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-122b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare laguna-m-1 ornith-1-5-122b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "laguna-m-1", "b": "ornith-1-5-122b"}at/mcp, no key